diagnostic checks
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3797
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: diagnostic checks
The Drubin-Watson suggests you have significant serial correlation.
Re: diagnostic checks
thanks for your reply
Is there a way to sort this out?
Is there a way to sort this out?
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3797
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: diagnostic checks
You probably have a variety of omitted slow-moving variables that would help explain the spread. The best thing to do would be to include such variables. The second best might be to make a statistical adjustment. Look at AR(1) in the EViews help.
Re: diagnostic checks
k
Last edited by johnsmith on Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3797
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: diagnostic checks
Probably.
The remaining issue is whether this has picked up a real lagged effect or just masked serial correlation. Unfortunately, in the latter case all the coefficients are screwed up. Normally, one would test this last model for serial correlation. Unfortunately, EViews doesn't seem to implement a test for panel data.
The other issue is to realize that this new model introduces a dynamic response that you have to take into account.
The remaining issue is whether this has picked up a real lagged effect or just masked serial correlation. Unfortunately, in the latter case all the coefficients are screwed up. Normally, one would test this last model for serial correlation. Unfortunately, EViews doesn't seem to implement a test for panel data.
The other issue is to realize that this new model introduces a dynamic response that you have to take into account.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
