SUR or Fixed Effects Reg. unbalanced panel

For technical questions regarding estimation of single equations, systems, VARs, Factor analysis and State Space Models in EViews. General econometric questions and advice should go in the Econometric Discussions forum.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

Drobi
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:41 am

SUR or Fixed Effects Reg. unbalanced panel

Postby Drobi » Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:09 am

Hi everyone,

I would like to run a SUR regression model or Fixed effects regression model on my unbalanced panel data.
SUR:
log(gini_net)=c(1)+c(2)*log(gdp_p_c_usd_ppp)^2+c(3)*log(gdp_p_c_usd_ppp)+c(4)*trade_openness+c(6)*inflation+c(7)*unemployment+c(8)*fc_total
log(gini_market)=c(9)+c(10)*log(gdp_p_c_usd_ppp)^2+c(11)*log(gdp_p_c_usd_ppp)+c(12)*trade_openness+c(14)*inflation+c(15)*unemployment
FE:
LS(?,CX=F,PER=F) LOG(GINI_NET) C LOG(GDP_P_C_USD_PPP) (LOG(GDP_P_C_USD_PPP))^2 TRADE_OPENNESS UNEMPLOYMENT INFLATION FC_TOTAL
For the fixed effects regression I employed time fixed and country fixed effects. I would like to use Driscoll-Kraay standard errors to account for cross sectional and temporal dependence. How do I best account for heteroskedastic and autocorrelation (poss. two lags) in the FE model?

Second, the SUR and FE model should give (ideally) similar results however I suspect it in its current version, does not account for time or country fixed effects nor forms of heteroskedastic and autocorrelation.

Thank you for any tips.
Attachments
eviewstest3.WF1
(1.42 MiB) Downloaded 281 times

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13604
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: SUR or Fixed Effects Reg. unbalanced panel

Postby EViews Gareth » Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:32 am

I'm not sure what your question is.

Drobi
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:41 am

Re: SUR or Fixed Effects Reg. unbalanced panel

Postby Drobi » Mon Apr 13, 2015 6:37 am

Sorry that it was a little unclear.
The results of both regressions are somewhat disappointing. I wonder, how to best control for heteroskedastic and autocorrelation in the FE model. Using White correlation coefficient matrix?

Second, the SUR results in completely different results, which I suspect might be due to the missing control for country and time fixed effects. How can I include that in the SUR model is there an option I can tick within Eviews to include these dummies?

Thank you

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13604
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: SUR or Fixed Effects Reg. unbalanced panel

Postby EViews Gareth » Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:13 am

EViews does not offer built in fixed effects for system estimation, including SUR, no.

Drobi
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:41 am

Re: SUR or Fixed Effects Reg. unbalanced panel

Postby Drobi » Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:48 am

Could I include @expand(country ,@dropfirst) in my SUR system to create cross section dummies and something similar for period effect? If yes, would it look like in the attachment? How could I do similar dummies for period effects.

thanks for the fast replies :D
Attachments
Capture.PNG
Capture.PNG (46.29 KiB) Viewed 6557 times

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13604
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: SUR or Fixed Effects Reg. unbalanced panel

Postby EViews Gareth » Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:58 am

You cannot. You'll have to add them manually.

Drobi
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:41 am

Re: SUR or Fixed Effects Reg. unbalanced panel

Postby Drobi » Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:39 am

Hi,

I now created a group of dummy variables for each country. However, I have difficulties including the group into the SUR model above. Or is it necessary to split up the group into separate series and include those manually into the SUR model. If so, how can I efficiently split up a group of dummies variables into series where each column represents one series?

Thank you for your help


Return to “Estimation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests