why do I get negative Rsquared in GMM?

For technical questions regarding estimation of single equations, systems, VARs, Factor analysis and State Space Models in EViews. General econometric questions and advice should go in the Econometric Discussions forum.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

ceycey
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:46 am

why do I get negative Rsquared in GMM?

Postby ceycey » Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:58 am

I need some help on the following estimation. I am using an unbalanced panel of european firms where I give cross section fixed effects to countries. I am using Gmm and using 1 period lagged independent variables as instruments.
My problem is I am getting negative R-squares! why does this happen? how do I interpret them? as for certain other samples where I am using the same estimation, I am not having any problems.

Please help!

best regards,
ceycey

Here is the output:

Dependent Variable: TLTA
Method: Panel Generalized Method of Moments
Date: 07/27/10 Time: 10:30
Sample: 1 33623 IF EMU=1
Periods included: 9335
Cross-sections included: 3
Total panel (unbalanced) observations: 11373
2SLS instrument weighting matrix
White cross-section standard errors & covariance (d.f. corrected)
Instrument list: C INT(-1) GRRGDP(-1) DMGDP(-1) SMTO(-1) FFGDP(-1) NFATA NEWSIZE PROF

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 3.061544 1.615473 1.895137 0.0581
INT -29.27661 17.95112 -1.630907 0.1029
GRRGDP 0.048518 0.161835 0.299796 0.7643
DMGDP -0.439105 0.345106 -1.272376 0.2033
SMTO -0.696454 0.376036 -1.852094 0.0640
FFGDP 1.431276 1.600090 0.894497 0.3711
NFATA -0.030261 0.012723 -2.378416 0.0174
NEWSIZE 0.023504 0.001675 14.02940 0.0000
PROF -0.027423 0.008144 -3.367231 0.0008

Effects Specification

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

R-squared -1.360221 Mean dependent var 0.530096
Adjusted R-squared -1.362299 S.D. dependent var 0.199136
S.E. of regression 0.306067 Sum squared resid 1064.359
Durbin-Watson stat 1.313768 J-statistic 2.90E-16
Instrument rank 11.000000

samijo
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: CO. USA

Re: why do I get negative Rsquared in GMM?

Postby samijo » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:45 am

In using IV estimation, the R-squared is no more bounded between 0 and 1. In general there is no measure of Goodness of Fit in IV except checking for the validity of the instruments.
Last edited by samijo on Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

ceycey
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:46 am

Re: why do I get negative Rsquared in GMM?

Postby ceycey » Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:16 am

Hi there,

Many thanks. The validity of instruments I believe are ok, so How do I do the goodness of fit check in IV?

samijo
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: CO. USA

Re: why do I get negative Rsquared in GMM?

Postby samijo » Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:29 am

Formally, there isn't! But I would take the square of the correlation between the original and fitted values as a pseudo R-Squared!

ceycey
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:46 am

Re: why do I get negative Rsquared in GMM?

Postby ceycey » Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:51 am

ok, thanks.


Return to “Estimation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests