Pooled Mean Group - PMG (PSS, 1999) vs. CS-ARDL/CS-DL (CMPR, 2015)

For technical questions regarding estimation of single equations, systems, VARs, Factor analysis and State Space Models in EViews. General econometric questions and advice should go in the Econometric Discussions forum.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

maragloria
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:09 am

Pooled Mean Group - PMG (PSS, 1999) vs. CS-ARDL/CS-DL (CMPR, 2015)

Postby maragloria » Tue Apr 04, 2017 3:30 pm

Hi there,

I would like to clarify a doubt I have concerning the PMG estimator in a panel setting. I'm using Eviews 9.5.

In the EViews 9 User’s Guide II (p. 838), it is stated that PMG (43.1 & 43.2) is appropriate in cases where there's correlation between the mean-differenced regressors and the error term.

However, in a recent paper by Alexander Chudik, Kamiar Mohaddes, M. Hashem Pesaran, and Mehdi Raissi (attached), the authors claim that PMG is not appropriate in such cases (neither is DOLS or FM-OLS). The authors suggests augmenting the regression with cross-sectional averages of the dependent and explanatory variables.

According to my understanding, the PMG as implemented by EViews (in a panel setting) do not augment the regression with cross-section averages. My question is: do you see a problem with adding these cross-section averages to a regression and continue to use PMG as the estimation method?

Many thanks!
Attachments
chudik_mohaddes_pesaran_raissi Is There a Debt-threshold Effect on Output Growth IMF_wp15197 2015m09.pdf
Application exemple
(2.19 MiB) Downloaded 556 times
chudik_mohaddes_pesaran_raissi_CD-ARDL_CS-DL_2015m09.pdf
Long-Run E¤ects in Large Heterogeneous Panel Data Models with Cross-Sectionally Correlated Errors
(473.3 KiB) Downloaded 579 times

Return to “Estimation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests