Augmented Dickey Fuller

For econometric discussions not necessarily related to EViews.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

mscarlatos
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:23 am

Augmented Dickey Fuller

Postby mscarlatos » Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:17 am

I am testing to see whether series is stationary via ADF. I get a test statistic of -2.8 vs Critical Value of -3.5 at 1%, -2.9 at 5% CV and -2.5 at 10% CV. Does this mean that my series is nonstationary at the 10% CV but statioanry at the 1% and 5% CVs?

glu
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 8:23 am

Re: Augmented Dickey Fuller

Postby glu » Tue May 04, 2010 9:38 am

No. While dealing with randomness, you have to be very careful in interpretation. In fact, there is no way to draw a clear-cut conclusion whether your time series is "indeed" stationary or not. All you can is to draw such a conclusion with one or other degree of reliability. The zero hypothesis tested by the ADF test, H0, is that a series is non-stationary. Rejecting it at the 1-percent level implies that out of 100 series, you might one time reject the zero hypothesis when it is true. With the 5-percent level, the chance is 5 to 100, with the 10-percent level the chance is 10 to 100. However, these are mere probabilities; you might make mistake in the rejection or not, nobody never knows.


Return to “Econometric Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest