Hi, everyone,
When I use PDLs to estimate a distributed lag model, how could I know each explanatory variable is significant or not?
As in Eviews help, PDL01 to PDL06 are all not significant to the t-statistic, The original coefficients seems also insignificant, can I ingore all these informations and only see the sum of lags? How can I judge whether the explanatory variables are significant or not?
Many thanks!
Significance in PDLs
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3797
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Significance in PDLs
Look at the representations view. You will see that an equation like
is estimated as
Y = C(1) + C(2)*PDL01 + C(3)*PDL02 + C(4)*PDL03
Use View/Coefficient diagnostics/Wald to test the hypothesis
Code: Select all
LS Y C PDL(X,3,2)
Y = C(1) + C(2)*PDL01 + C(3)*PDL02 + C(4)*PDL03
Use View/Coefficient diagnostics/Wald to test the hypothesis
Code: Select all
c(2)=c(3)=c(4)=0
Re: Significance in PDLs
Many thanks!
I still don't know if all the PDLs are significant according to Wald test, then the related sum of lags must be significant? As the t-statistic indicate that sum of lags is not significant.
How to know the significance of the "sum of lags" at the bottom of the table?
Many thanks!
I still don't know if all the PDLs are significant according to Wald test, then the related sum of lags must be significant? As the t-statistic indicate that sum of lags is not significant.
How to know the significance of the "sum of lags" at the bottom of the table?
Many thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
