Seemingly Unrelated Regression

For technical questions regarding estimation of single equations, systems, VARs, Factor analysis and State Space Models in EViews. General econometric questions and advice should go in the Econometric Discussions forum.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

canboardrp
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:11 am

Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby canboardrp » Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:34 am

Hello,

I'm trying to estimate the following using the seemingly unrelated equations methodology but I get an error, near singular matrix prompt. What's the cause of this and how can I adjust the programming to ensure that this doesn't occur?
LOG(RTDDPE) = C(1) + C(2)*LOG(REPNL)+C(3)*LOG(POPNL)+C(4)*LOG(HDDNL)
LOG(RTDDPE) = C(5) + C(6)*LOG(REPPE)+C(7)*LOG(POPPE)+C(8)*LOG(HDDPE)
LOG(RTDDNS) = C(9) + C(10)*LOG(REPNS)+C(11)*LOG(POPNS)+C(12)*LOG(HDDNS)
LOG(RTDDNB) = C(13) + C(14)*LOG(REPNB)+C(15)*LOG(POPNB)+C(16)*LOG(HDDNB)

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby startz » Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:47 am

What happens when you estimate the equations separately by LS?

canboardrp
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:11 am

Re: Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby canboardrp » Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:49 am

The equations when estimated using LS work.

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13604
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby EViews Gareth » Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:02 am

Don't you have the same dependent variable twice?

canboardrp
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:11 am

Re: Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby canboardrp » Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:04 am

Gah. I'd missed that typo in the programming.

Thanks.

econworker
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:51 am

Re: Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby econworker » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:29 am

Hi Eviews Gareth, I hope you reply my question here.
I am trying to set up this model in Eviews to estimate it with using a SUR system model:

RHO_GOLD_GASOLINE = C(1) + C(2)*LOGD_TBILLS + C(3)*LOGD_USEX + C(4)*MAC_ADS + C(5)*RHO_GOLD_GASOLINE(-1)+ [AR(1)=C(6)]
RHO_GOLD_HO = C(7) + C(8)*LOGD_TBILLS + C(9)*LOGD_USEX + C(10)*MAC_ADS + C(11)*RHO_GOLD_HO(-1) + [AR(1)=C(12)]
RHO_GOLD_NG = C(13) + C(14)*LOGD_TBILLS + C(15)*LOGD_USEX + C(16)*MAC_ADS + C(17)*RHO_GOLD_NG(-1) + [AR(1)=C(18)]
RHO_GOLD_WTI = C(19) + C(20)*LOGD_TBILLS + C(21)*LOGD_USEX + C(22)*MAC_ADS + C(23)*RHO_GOLD_WTI(-1) + [AR(1)=C(24)]

The problem is that if I estimate the system without AR(1) term there is no problem and it works fine, however when I include the AR(1) term to the model and I push ok to estimate it, Eviews suddenly stop to work and I have to close it completely, I tried it with different sets of data and still getting the same problem. I would like to know do you have any idea why Eviews can not estimate a SUR model that includes AR(1) term and lagged dependent variable in the same time? can it be a problem with my Eviews?
If you need I can attach you the workfile.
Thanks

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby startz » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:50 am

The first thing Gareth is going to ask you is what the version and build date is of your EViews copy. Look under Help/About.

econworker
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:51 am

Re: Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby econworker » Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:32 am

The first thing Gareth is going to ask you is what the version and build date is of your EViews copy. Look under Help/About.
Thanks for quick reply Startz, its Eviews 8, 19 November 2013 build.

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby startz » Tue Jul 22, 2014 7:33 am

You might just do an update and see if that happens to fix the problem.

econworker
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:51 am

Re: Seemingly Unrelated Regression

Postby econworker » Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:39 am

You might just do an update and see if that happens to fix the problem.
It is solved thanks alot.


Return to “Estimation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests