Hi guys,
I'm a massive rookie just starting to use EViews so please bear with me. I am trying to write a code that will drop insignificant variables from a system of equations (in a more technical language, I am trying to create an unbalanced Seemingly Unrelated Regression from a balanced one because I see some variables are not significant). Any ideas on how to proceed?
Thanks..
Dropping Insignificant Variables
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator, EViews Jason, EViews Matt
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Dropping Insignificant Variables
Out of curiosity, why would you want to drop variables just because they are insignificant?
Re: Dropping Insignificant Variables
I heard somewhere that the balanced SUR is really just OLS but I could be wrong..
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Dropping Insignificant Variables
Yes, balanced SUR is just OLS. Is that bad?
Re: Dropping Insignificant Variables
Not if the errors are still assumed to be correlated across equations. Is this still true?
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Dropping Insignificant Variables
In the case where the RHS variables are identical, SUR and OLS are numerically identical without regard to the correlation across equations. It's sort of an algebraic oddity.
Re: Dropping Insignificant Variables
Would it then not make sense to start dropping insignificant variables so that you end up with an unbalanced SUR that does acknowledge the correlation across equations? (if theory suggests your LHS variables must be somewhat correlated)
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Dropping Insignificant Variables
No.
(1) The fact the LHS variables are correlated doesn't require the errors to be correlated. Correlated RHS variables will do it.
(2) The fact that a variable is insignificant does not mean it's coefficient equals zero. It means that the data can't tell you whether the coefficient equals zero or not.
(1) The fact the LHS variables are correlated doesn't require the errors to be correlated. Correlated RHS variables will do it.
(2) The fact that a variable is insignificant does not mean it's coefficient equals zero. It means that the data can't tell you whether the coefficient equals zero or not.
Re: Dropping Insignificant Variables
(1) Bit nervous about the second part of your statement as errors by defintion are outside of the RHS variables
(2) True, but there are costs to leaving the coefficiens in
Anyway would really appreciate if someone could comment on my original question. Thanks!
(2) True, but there are costs to leaving the coefficiens in
Anyway would really appreciate if someone could comment on my original question. Thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
