Wald test
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator
Wald test
Hello,
I estimated a probit model with 7 explanatory variables of which 3 are dummy variables. Two of the explanatory variables are giving me a hard time: they have a z-statistic of -0.95 and 1.46 and p-values of 0.34 and 0.14. Therefore I concluded that they are not statistically signifcant. The Wald-test comes to the same result.
BUT if I run a reduntant variable test on those two explanatory variables, they are highly significant! (The correleation between those two variables is 0.82).
How can this be, that one time they are statistically significant and the other time not???
Thank you very much
I estimated a probit model with 7 explanatory variables of which 3 are dummy variables. Two of the explanatory variables are giving me a hard time: they have a z-statistic of -0.95 and 1.46 and p-values of 0.34 and 0.14. Therefore I concluded that they are not statistically signifcant. The Wald-test comes to the same result.
BUT if I run a reduntant variable test on those two explanatory variables, they are highly significant! (The correleation between those two variables is 0.82).
How can this be, that one time they are statistically significant and the other time not???
Thank you very much
-
EViews Glenn
- EViews Developer
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:17 am
Re: Wald test
What Wald test did you run?
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Wald test
It is very common for two coefficients to be jointly significant when neither is individually significant. Essentially, there is something common to the two variables that matters, but because the two variables are highly correlated it isn't possible to separate out which variable is responsible for the outcomes.
Re: Wald test
The one that eviews offers for the coefficient diagnostics (wald - Coefficient Restrictions...)
Re: Wald test
the thing is that I estimated various model, and all of them had those 2 variables included. And in all cases but this one, I was able to distinguish between those two variables.
Does a high correlation not only start at 0.98 and not already at 0.82?
Does a high correlation not only start at 0.98 and not already at 0.82?
-
EViews Glenn
- EViews Developer
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:17 am
Re: Wald test
On the Wald test...
Yes, but which hypothesis to test did you enter?
Yes, but which hypothesis to test did you enter?
Re: Wald test
I am not sure if I understood your question...
I estimated a probit model.
Is this the answer to your question?
I estimated a probit model.
Is this the answer to your question?
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Wald test
When you went to
what command did you enter?The one that eviews offers for the coefficient diagnostics (wald - Coefficient Restrictions...)
Re: Wald test
the only way possible .. c(3), c(4).
I really think that I am not getting your question
I really think that I am not getting your question
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Wald test
Glenn asked for the command you entered. Did you type "c(3),c(4)"? Or did you type something different involving c(3) and c(4)?the only way possible .. c(3), c(4).
I really think that I am not getting your question
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Wald test
When I do that on my version nothing happens. Equal signs are required as part of the specification.
Re: Wald test
My coefficients indeed have different signs... do you think this is the problem??Equal signs are required as part of the specification.
Is it not possible to perform a wald test on two coefficients with different signs?
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Wald test
By "equal signs" I meant literally "="My coefficients indeed have different signs... do you think this is the problem??Equal signs are required as part of the specification.
Is it not possible to perform a wald test on two coefficients with different signs?
Re: Wald test
Oh I am so sorry! This was completely my fault!
Of course I mean C(3)=0 and C(4)=0
Of course I mean C(3)=0 and C(4)=0
Return to “Econometric Discussions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
