Hi! I have an important question about the p value for the likelihood ratio test.
The command is
scalar lr =-2*(RESTAOECD1.@logl - UNRESTAOECD.@logl)
the value is -1,403
to obtain the p-value for the lr test result i have used the formula
scalar lr_pval=1-@cchisq(-1.405855922849895,1)
It says that there shouldnt be negative numbers. How do i solve the scalar lr_pval formula then?
Another question: The likelihoodratio test nullhypothesis is that a restricted model equals an unrestricted model, right?
so if the p-value is high, like 0,4 or so on, it would mean, that the nullhypothesis cannot be rejected, and the models are equal?
Thanks for your help!!
Likelihood Ratio Test P Value
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Likelihood Ratio Test P Value
Something is probably wrong in your estimation. The restricted log likelihood can't be higher than the unrestricted, since the possible parameter values for the latter include the restricted estimates.
-
mjones1985
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:09 am
Re: Likelihood Ratio Test P Value
Ok thank you!
i want to model a stochastic trend like : μ_t=μ_(t-1)+ η_t mit η_t~ normalverteilt(0,σ_η^2)
i generated to series, one nrnd fpr η_t and one for μ_t = nrds
where is the mistake?
i want to model a stochastic trend like : μ_t=μ_(t-1)+ η_t mit η_t~ normalverteilt(0,σ_η^2)
i generated to series, one nrnd fpr η_t and one for μ_t = nrds
where is the mistake?
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Likelihood Ratio Test P Value
You may want to show your actual code to see if someone can find a bug.Ok thank you!
i want to model a stochastic trend like : μ_t=μ_(t-1)+ η_t mit η_t~ normalverteilt(0,σ_η^2)
i generated to series, one nrnd fpr η_t and one for μ_t = nrds
where is the mistake?
-
mjones1985
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:09 am
Re: Likelihood Ratio Test P Value
The unrestricted model ist LOGPECAPOECD = C(1)*STOCHASTICTRENDFINAL + C(2)*LOGGDPOECD + C(3)*LOGPMAXT + C(4)*LOGPRECT + C(5)*LOGPCUTTFINAL
where LOGPECAPOECD is the natural logarithm or per capita gdp, and stochastictrendfinal is the stochastic trend generated as: stochastictrendfinal = stochtrend(-1) + stochtrend2, in which stochtrend and stochtrend2 where generated nrnd series.
I would like to test, rather the stochastictrend is important for the model, or a constant is better.
But if i substitute the stochastic trend for a constant c, the model is not restricted, because the likelihood gets bigger as you pointed out.
another question i have, what can i do with the natural logarithm of a negative series?
i want to use the log of negative growth rates, my only possible way to use them in this model was to log the positiv numbers, and multiply them with -1, but i think thats crap :(.
But other authors used it before, can you imagine how they did it?
where LOGPECAPOECD is the natural logarithm or per capita gdp, and stochastictrendfinal is the stochastic trend generated as: stochastictrendfinal = stochtrend(-1) + stochtrend2, in which stochtrend and stochtrend2 where generated nrnd series.
I would like to test, rather the stochastictrend is important for the model, or a constant is better.
But if i substitute the stochastic trend for a constant c, the model is not restricted, because the likelihood gets bigger as you pointed out.
another question i have, what can i do with the natural logarithm of a negative series?
i want to use the log of negative growth rates, my only possible way to use them in this model was to log the positiv numbers, and multiply them with -1, but i think thats crap :(.
But other authors used it before, can you imagine how they did it?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
