Eliminate Autocorrelation with a Method other than Ar(1)

For econometric discussions not necessarily related to EViews.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

yoyoo
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:15 pm

Eliminate Autocorrelation with a Method other than Ar(1)

Postby yoyoo » Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:52 am

Hi,
I have used ar(1) to address the issue of autocorrelation. The Durbin-Watson value reached 1.85 which is excellent. However, none of the independent variables become significant. Is there other than ar(1) to eliminate autocorrelation? Please see attached.
Thank you in advance.
Attachments
untitled.JPG
untitled.JPG (75.24 KiB) Viewed 4343 times

yoyoo
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:15 pm

Re: Eliminate Autocorrelation with a Method other than Ar(1)

Postby yoyoo » Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:39 am

Dear All,
Can anyone help me on this? If not, could you please refer me to where I can find a solution.
Thank you in advance.

EViews Glenn
EViews Developer
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:17 am

Re: Eliminate Autocorrelation with a Method other than Ar(1)

Postby EViews Glenn » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:31 pm

You can add lagged endogenous to the specification to whiten the residuals.

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Eliminate Autocorrelation with a Method other than Ar(1)

Postby startz » Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:09 pm

You can add lagged endogenous to the specification to whiten the residuals.
But don't do it unless you have a very specific reason to. AR(1) and a lagged endogenous variable are not the same specification and lead to very different interpretations of the dynamic response of he system to the exogenous variables.

EViews Glenn
EViews Developer
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:17 am

Re: Eliminate Autocorrelation with a Method other than Ar(1)

Postby EViews Glenn » Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:32 pm

True, unless there are no other regressors. It didn't seem to me that the original AR specification was chosen with a particular dynamic structure in mind. I was going to add originally, but didn't, that if the significance of results changed a lot, I would worry...


Return to “Econometric Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests