Too many ARMA terms

For technical questions regarding estimation of single equations, systems, VARs, Factor analysis and State Space Models in EViews. General econometric questions and advice should go in the Econometric Discussions forum.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

Zappa_F
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:27 am

Too many ARMA terms

Postby Zappa_F » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:28 am

Hi everybody,

I encountered an akward thing today. In my sample I have about 550 monthly observations. I wanted to estimate an ARMA(12,12), therefore I clicked "Quick" --> "Estimate equation" and then the usual window pops up which asks me to type in the dependent followed by the independent variables. Done as told, I typed in

"Y C AR(1) AR(2) AR(3) AR(4) AR(5) AR(6) AR(7) AR(8) AR(9) AR(10) AR(11) AR(12) MA(1) MA(2) MA(3) MA(4) MA(5) MA(6) MA(7) MA(8) MA(9) MA(10) MA(11) MA(12)"
Hitting enter -o my surprise- Eviews7 returned an error message saying:

"Too many ARMA terms"

When I deleted the last MA term (i.e. estimating an ARMA(12,11), also ARMA(11,12)) and hit the ok button again it worked perfectly fine.... Is there a default setting that lets me estimate at the utmost 24 coefficients???

Thx. Z

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13585
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Too many ARMA terms

Postby EViews Gareth » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:30 am

There is no way to override it.

Zappa_F
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:27 am

Re: Too many ARMA terms

Postby Zappa_F » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:48 am

Hey Gareth,

I don't follow, to be honest. So does this mean that there is a limit of 24 coeffs that can be estimated. Maybe it's lost in translation since i#m not a native English speaker but what do you mean by "override"?

Z

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13585
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Too many ARMA terms

Postby EViews Gareth » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:49 am

There is a hard-coded limit of 24 ARMA terms. There is nothing you can do to change it.

Zappa_F
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:27 am

Re: Too many ARMA terms

Postby Zappa_F » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:57 am

Thank you very much for your quick response, Gareth.

Cheers Z

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3796
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Too many ARMA terms

Postby startz » Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:57 am

This may not be terribly helpful, but I've never seen anyone estimate an ARMA(12,12). Is there a reason you need so many terms?

Zappa_F
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:27 am

Re: Too many ARMA terms

Postby Zappa_F » Thu Mar 01, 2012 12:09 pm

Well, the reason lies in the fact that I am programming the model described in Henry & Olekalns 2002, Southern Economic Journal on monthly dates. Therefore, I wanted to span lagged values of one year which necessitates the inclusion of 12 lags of AR and MA.

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3796
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Too many ARMA terms

Postby startz » Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:43 pm

Hmmm, can this be done by including lags of y rather than AR terms to get under the limit?


Return to “Estimation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests