missunderstandings in Eviews Guide formula

For econometric discussions not necessarily related to EViews.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

audrkaba
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:34 am

missunderstandings in Eviews Guide formula

Postby audrkaba » Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:36 am

I'm trying to understand how did you get a free coefficient in formula (21.30), EViews 7 User’s Guide II, p. 100. In formula (21.29) this free coefficient is equal to 9.034790, but in formula (21.30) this coefficient becomes equal to 0.0063. How is this possible?

EViews Glenn
EViews Developer
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:17 am

Re: missunderstandings in Eviews Guide formula

Postby EViews Glenn » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:20 am

It's from the AR polynomial expansion. Take the second equation, substitute in for u, and expand the polynomial on the left-hand side

(1-.980243L - .964553L4 + .980243*.964553*L5)(y - .9034790) = (1+.52L)*(1-.98L4)e

I'm doing the left-hand side in high precision since I'll need it to get the result. The right, we'll just leave as is...Note the presence of the constant on the left-hand side which gets multiplied by the AR polynomial. Then multiplying through and carrying the terms over to the right-hand side, we have

y = c + .980243*y(-1) + .964553*y(-4) - .980234*.964553*y(-5) + (1+.52L)*(1-.98L4)e

where

c = (1-.980243-.964553+.980243*.964553)*.9034790

which is about c = 0.000632730177.

audrkaba
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:34 am

Re: missunderstandings in Eviews Guide formula

Postby audrkaba » Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:53 am

ok, now it's clear... but you should use 9.034790 instead of 0.9034790 in your answer :)

EViews Glenn
EViews Developer
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:17 am

Re: missunderstandings in Eviews Guide formula

Postby EViews Glenn » Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:51 pm

Oops :oops: , er, I meant to do that to see if you were paying attention.


Return to “Econometric Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests