Testing for increased impact?

For econometric discussions not necessarily related to EViews.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

jjnull
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:03 pm

Testing for increased impact?

Postby jjnull » Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:29 pm

Hi all,
I'm working on my econometrics project and would like to ask if it is possible to test for a "stronger impact" of an explanatory variable on the dependent variable during different time periods.

For example, before the financial crisis, firm size has a positive impact on stock price. Is it possible to test if during the financial crisis, firm size has a stronger, positive impact on stock prices than before the crisis? Btw I'm using panel data which stretches from 2004 to 2010 Q2. Regression method is OLS.

I'm new to econometrics, would appreciate if anyone can help me with this. Thanks! :)

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Testing for increased impact?

Postby startz » Tue Sep 14, 2010 6:56 am

Define a dummy variable, DF, that equals one during the financial crisis and zero otherwise. Then something like

ls y c x DF DF*x

and test is the last coefficient is significantly greater than zero.

jjnull
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:03 pm

Re: Testing for increased impact?

Postby jjnull » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:01 am

Hey Startz,
thanks!

Hmm if I do that then I can't do a time period fixed effect LSDV anymore right?? Is there anyway to do the dummy thing plus a time period fixed effects regression?
Define a dummy variable, DF, that equals one during the financial crisis and zero otherwise. Then something like

ls y c x DF DF*x

and test is the last coefficient is significantly greater than zero.

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Testing for increased impact?

Postby startz » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:15 am

Hey Startz,
thanks!

Hmm if I do that then I can't do a time period fixed effect LSDV anymore right?? Is there anyway to do the dummy thing plus a time period fixed effects regression?
Define a dummy variable, DF, that equals one during the financial crisis and zero otherwise. Then something like

ls y c x DF DF*x

and test is the last coefficient is significantly greater than zero.
Actually, you can take out the DF term, leave in DF*x, and keep in the fixed effects. (I think)

jjnull
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:03 pm

Re: Testing for increased impact?

Postby jjnull » Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:17 pm

Hey Startz,
thanks!

Hmm if I do that then I can't do a time period fixed effect LSDV anymore right?? Is there anyway to do the dummy thing plus a time period fixed effects regression?
Define a dummy variable, DF, that equals one during the financial crisis and zero otherwise. Then something like

ls y c x DF DF*x

and test is the last coefficient is significantly greater than zero.
Actually, you can take out the DF term, leave in DF*x, and keep in the fixed effects. (I think)
Hmmm makes sense, since in a fixed period panel, all periods have their own intercept.
But sadly the results doesn't tally with the regressions that i ran seperately.
Anywyay, thanks startz! :)


Return to “Econometric Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests