Search found 22 matches

by obicna89
Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:24 pm
Forum: Estimation
Topic: another blanchard quah decomp
Replies: 0
Views: 2901

another blanchard quah decomp

hi! i am using a bivariate VAR, and that means i have to impose one restriction on the long run matrix C. but theory i am testing says i need to impose the restriction that if we are looking at the coefficents of C: c11 c12 c21 c22 i have to impose that c12 = -c22. can i do that and how? c11 and c21...
by obicna89
Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:42 pm
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: VEC interpretation
Replies: 1
Views: 3492

Re: VEC interpretation

Hello, I have the following money demand model as a VAr cash_SA gdp_SA savings_rate ATM_growth When I run the VEC, I get these results. However, shouldn´t all this coefficientes be negative in order to intepret them as error correction terms? CointEq1 -0.011958 0.000962 -3.02E-06 2.99E-06 (0.00605)...
by obicna89
Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:39 pm
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: First difference
Replies: 6
Views: 17385

Re: First difference

Dear all, I am trying to run an OLS regression with time series data. My data turns out to be non-stationary at level; however it is stationary at the first difference (ADF). My issue is that when I run the regression with first difference variables the effect they have becomes insignificant. Where...
by obicna89
Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:10 pm
Forum: Estimation
Topic: Markov switching model
Replies: 30
Views: 74820

Re: Markov switching model

i need help please. when i write the code in the LogL object and try to run it, it says that the !nr is an illegal or reserved name in '!nr=2'
why is this happening?
by obicna89
Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:38 pm
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: Steps of estimating VECM and interpretation of the results
Replies: 3
Views: 28215

Re: Steps of estimating VECM and interpretation of the resul

if you look at VAR(p) model, the VEC representation of this model is p-1 (the p refers to the lags). so if you estimate first a VAR(1) model, this means that: Z(t)=a+b*Z(t-1)+e(t), where Z(t) is vector of the variables you are working with, a is the vector of constants, etc. the VEC representation o...
by obicna89
Thu Nov 17, 2011 11:51 am
Forum: Estimation
Topic: removing constant from variance equation - garch
Replies: 1
Views: 3370

removing constant from variance equation - garch

hi!

can i remove constant from the variance equation in garch modeling?
i can't find an option to remove it.. thank you
by obicna89
Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:08 am
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: arch+garch > 1
Replies: 1
Views: 3273

Re: arch+garch > 1

try different specifications, like garch(2,1) etc.
by obicna89
Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:06 am
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: garch, additional variables + finite variance
Replies: 2
Views: 4821

garch, additional variables + finite variance

hello! i wanted to ask somebody, i am having trouble with finding out this: when i add variables into the variance equation, the estimated parameters... do i have to put a constraint on them, i.e. see if the estimated parameter is valid. because when you have a normal garch, without additional varia...
by obicna89
Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:51 am
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: hausman test
Replies: 6
Views: 20733

Re: hausman test

if there aren't any (or appear to be) individual effects, it means one shouldn't use random effects or FE cross-section? should one use FE time fixed? edit: oh and i have a question.. eveiws gave me the same result: hausman test statistic set to zero. but when i compute the test stat manualy, i got ...
by obicna89
Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:58 pm
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: Deflating and deseasoning
Replies: 3
Views: 6168

Re: Deflating and deseasoning

I thought the index of industrial production was already inflation adjusted, but maybe my memory's off.
no, the data I have is gross data.

btw, do you know, if I should deflate first or deseason?
by obicna89
Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:48 pm
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: Deflating and deseasoning
Replies: 3
Views: 6168

Deflating and deseasoning

Hello! Need help, obviously :)) So, I want to deflate the monthly index of industrial production, and I have the monthly data on CPI, with base year 2005. Am I doing it right: Date - IIP - CPI (base=average of 2005) - divider - Real value of IIP 2007m01 - 88,7 - 102,7 - 1,027 - 86,37 so is it ok, ju...
by obicna89
Sun Jul 03, 2011 1:13 am
Forum: Econometric Discussions
Topic: hausman test
Replies: 6
Views: 20733

Re: hausman test

It means that the random effects estimate of the cross-section variance term is zero, so that there is no evidence of individual effects in your data.
does this mean one should use random effects?
by obicna89
Sat Jul 02, 2011 11:30 am
Forum: Data Manipulation
Topic: correcting t stat in panel
Replies: 12
Views: 15081

Re: correcting t stat in panel

I was responding to the post by Econometrics_is_fun. I don't believe that EViews offers autocorrelation consistent standard errors in panels. You can, however, include an AR(1) term in the regression. oh, i am sorry. i thought you were respondig to mine comments :) the problem is, when i use ar(1) ...
by obicna89
Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:58 am
Forum: Data Manipulation
Topic: correcting t stat in panel
Replies: 12
Views: 15081

Re: correcting t stat in panel

The White cross section method corrects standard errors for heteroskedasticity. It does not correct for autocorrelation.
when you said no, i asked you how can i correct autocorr, i didn't ask you this (quoted).

Go to advanced search