Search found 22 matches
- Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:24 pm
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: another blanchard quah decomp
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2901
another blanchard quah decomp
hi! i am using a bivariate VAR, and that means i have to impose one restriction on the long run matrix C. but theory i am testing says i need to impose the restriction that if we are looking at the coefficents of C: c11 c12 c21 c22 i have to impose that c12 = -c22. can i do that and how? c11 and c21...
- Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:42 pm
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: VEC interpretation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3492
Re: VEC interpretation
Hello, I have the following money demand model as a VAr cash_SA gdp_SA savings_rate ATM_growth When I run the VEC, I get these results. However, shouldn´t all this coefficientes be negative in order to intepret them as error correction terms? CointEq1 -0.011958 0.000962 -3.02E-06 2.99E-06 (0.00605)...
- Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:39 pm
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: First difference
- Replies: 6
- Views: 17385
Re: First difference
Dear all, I am trying to run an OLS regression with time series data. My data turns out to be non-stationary at level; however it is stationary at the first difference (ADF). My issue is that when I run the regression with first difference variables the effect they have becomes insignificant. Where...
- Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:10 pm
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Markov switching model
- Replies: 30
- Views: 74820
Re: Markov switching model
i need help please. when i write the code in the LogL object and try to run it, it says that the !nr is an illegal or reserved name in '!nr=2'
why is this happening?
why is this happening?
- Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:38 pm
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: Steps of estimating VECM and interpretation of the results
- Replies: 3
- Views: 28215
Re: Steps of estimating VECM and interpretation of the resul
if you look at VAR(p) model, the VEC representation of this model is p-1 (the p refers to the lags). so if you estimate first a VAR(1) model, this means that: Z(t)=a+b*Z(t-1)+e(t), where Z(t) is vector of the variables you are working with, a is the vector of constants, etc. the VEC representation o...
- Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:04 pm
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: garch, additional variables + finite variance
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4821
Re: garch, additional variables + finite variance
anyone, please: (
- Thu Nov 17, 2011 11:51 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: removing constant from variance equation - garch
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3370
removing constant from variance equation - garch
hi!
can i remove constant from the variance equation in garch modeling?
i can't find an option to remove it.. thank you
can i remove constant from the variance equation in garch modeling?
i can't find an option to remove it.. thank you
- Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:08 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: arch+garch > 1
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3273
Re: arch+garch > 1
try different specifications, like garch(2,1) etc.
- Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:06 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: garch, additional variables + finite variance
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4821
garch, additional variables + finite variance
hello! i wanted to ask somebody, i am having trouble with finding out this: when i add variables into the variance equation, the estimated parameters... do i have to put a constraint on them, i.e. see if the estimated parameter is valid. because when you have a normal garch, without additional varia...
- Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:51 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: hausman test
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20733
Re: hausman test
if there aren't any (or appear to be) individual effects, it means one shouldn't use random effects or FE cross-section? should one use FE time fixed? edit: oh and i have a question.. eveiws gave me the same result: hausman test statistic set to zero. but when i compute the test stat manualy, i got ...
- Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:58 pm
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: Deflating and deseasoning
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6168
Re: Deflating and deseasoning
no, the data I have is gross data.I thought the index of industrial production was already inflation adjusted, but maybe my memory's off.
btw, do you know, if I should deflate first or deseason?
- Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:48 pm
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: Deflating and deseasoning
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6168
Deflating and deseasoning
Hello! Need help, obviously :)) So, I want to deflate the monthly index of industrial production, and I have the monthly data on CPI, with base year 2005. Am I doing it right: Date - IIP - CPI (base=average of 2005) - divider - Real value of IIP 2007m01 - 88,7 - 102,7 - 1,027 - 86,37 so is it ok, ju...
- Sun Jul 03, 2011 1:13 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: hausman test
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20733
Re: hausman test
does this mean one should use random effects?It means that the random effects estimate of the cross-section variance term is zero, so that there is no evidence of individual effects in your data.
- Sat Jul 02, 2011 11:30 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: correcting t stat in panel
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15081
Re: correcting t stat in panel
I was responding to the post by Econometrics_is_fun. I don't believe that EViews offers autocorrelation consistent standard errors in panels. You can, however, include an AR(1) term in the regression. oh, i am sorry. i thought you were respondig to mine comments :) the problem is, when i use ar(1) ...
- Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:58 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: correcting t stat in panel
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15081
Re: correcting t stat in panel
when you said no, i asked you how can i correct autocorr, i didn't ask you this (quoted).The White cross section method corrects standard errors for heteroskedasticity. It does not correct for autocorrelation.
