Page 1 of 1

EViews 8 crashed on [model].@overrides or .@olist

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:38 am
by tbui
Hi EViews gurus,

I have problem when trying [model].@overrides or [model].@olist commands in EViews 8. It crashed EViews and here are the details

Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: EViews8_x64.exe
Application Version: 8.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 51faa4cd
Fault Module Name: EViews8_x64.exe
Fault Module Version: 8.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 51faa4cd
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 000000000023f7f0
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.4
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: c191
Additional Information 2: c1913122100af24c1e19d9a6e2b4d8a9
Additional Information 3: 2653
Additional Information 4: 265370d4f33879410fc7cd0b868efe92

Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid= ... cid=0x0409

If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt

Is there any known fix for this issue?

Thanks,

T

Re: EViews 8 crashed on [model].@overrides or .@olist

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:17 am
by EViews Gareth
What is the build date of your copy of EViews?

Re: EViews 8 crashed on [model].@overrides or .@olist

Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 7:51 am
by tbui
I updated to Sept 12 build. Still have Eviews crashed once a while. Not sure what triggers it. Possibly problem with linked series.
Previous issue could be due to network drive sharing violation.

Re: EViews 8 crashed on [model].@overrides or .@olist

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:33 am
by tbui
I still have issues with Eviews crashing when trying to use @overrides or @olist command. Not happening with @aflist or @exoglist.
Any suggestion?
T

Re: EViews 8 crashed on [model].@overrides or .@olist

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:39 am
by EViews Gareth
ok, we'll take a look and issue a fix in the next patch.

Re: EViews 8 crashed on [model].@overrides or .@olist

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 12:42 pm
by tbui
Just got the latest patch on 10/17. It's working (finger-crossed)
Thanks,
T