Strange EGARCH-M forecast bug.
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 12:03 pm
Hi guys,
Using EViews 8 May 6 build (although I suspect that nothing recent has changed the equation which i'm trying to estimate), I'm running forecasts of EGARCH-M models. I've run this successfully to estimate about 80 out of sample forecasts or so, so far, but one series gives me a strange 'unable to compute due to missing data' error. However, there is no missing data, and this is only a uni-variate forecasting exercise.
Attached is the work-file with the series with an equation with the egarch(1,1,1) with log variance in the mean equation. Forecasting from this equation seems fine throughout the whole sample, but if you change the start date to just run out of sample forecasts (in fact, anything from about 2007:q1?) on-wards, it gives the error, which seems strange....
Any suggestions as to why this is happening would be great (maybe it isnt a bug, and I'm just using a very naive model specification, which I am, but I am still confused as to why it gives me this specific error message).
Best wishes, and thanks again for your time,
Charlie
Using EViews 8 May 6 build (although I suspect that nothing recent has changed the equation which i'm trying to estimate), I'm running forecasts of EGARCH-M models. I've run this successfully to estimate about 80 out of sample forecasts or so, so far, but one series gives me a strange 'unable to compute due to missing data' error. However, there is no missing data, and this is only a uni-variate forecasting exercise.
Attached is the work-file with the series with an equation with the egarch(1,1,1) with log variance in the mean equation. Forecasting from this equation seems fine throughout the whole sample, but if you change the start date to just run out of sample forecasts (in fact, anything from about 2007:q1?) on-wards, it gives the error, which seems strange....
Any suggestions as to why this is happening would be great (maybe it isnt a bug, and I'm just using a very naive model specification, which I am, but I am still confused as to why it gives me this specific error message).
Best wishes, and thanks again for your time,
Charlie