GARCH-M with implied volatility only

For questions regarding programming in the EViews programming language.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator, EViews Jason, EViews Matt

DJM
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:02 am

GARCH-M with implied volatility only

Postby DJM » Wed Jul 25, 2012 6:13 am

Hello,

I am estimating a GARCH(1,1) model and it has an additional variance regressor. I want to obtain the likelihood ratio value when there are no ARCH or GARCH terms - so I only have the implied volatility appearing in the variance regressor.

This is my first attempt at programming ever and any guidance/pointers are much appreciated. I have not completely understood everything yet and am still reading. I have been using the samples provided as well.

NOTE: I am NOT asking someone to write the code for me - just practical help.

I am using Eviews 7.

Code: Select all

' GARCH-M with constant and implied volatility in the conditional variance equation ' change path to program path %path = @runpath cd %path ' load workfile load new thesis approach series y = logsp ' set sample (1/02/1990-12/31/1996) sample s0 1/02/1990 12/31/1996 ' get starting values from Gaussian GARCH-M equation eq1 eq1.arch(0,0,garch,archm=var, logvix) y c show eq1.output ' declare and initialize parameters coef(1) lambda0 = eq1.c(1) coef(1) lambda1 = eq1.c(2) coef(1) mu = eq1.c(3) ' set presample values of expressions in logl smpl s0 series sig2 = omega(1) series res = 0 ' set up GARCH likelihood logl ll1 ll1.append @logl logl ll1.append res = y-mu(1) ll1.append sig2 = omega(1)+alpha(1)*res(-1)^2 +beta(1)*sig2(-1) ll1.append z = res^2/sig2/(tdf(1)-2) + 1 ll1.append logl = @gammalog((tdf(1) + 1)/2) - @gammalog(tdf(1)/2) - log(!pi)/2 - log(tdf(1) - 2)/2 - log(sig2)/2 - (tdf(1)+1)*log(z)/2 ' estimate and display output smpl s1 ll1.ml(showopts, m=1000, c=1e-5)
Thank you for your help

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13604
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: GARCH-M with implied volatility only

Postby EViews Gareth » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:40 am

Hard to tell you how to improve your current program if you don't explain why it isn't doing what you want it to do.


Return to “Programming”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests