VECM Estimation Discrepancy

For technical questions regarding estimation of single equations, systems, VARs, Factor analysis and State Space Models in EViews. General econometric questions and advice should go in the Econometric Discussions forum.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

EviewsUser99
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:01 am

VECM Estimation Discrepancy

Postby EviewsUser99 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:14 am

Hello,

I've been estimating VECMs using the VAR object and running a few tests related to the effect of model misspecification using simulated data. In particular, I've been looking at estimating a VECM with 2 cointegration vectors when the simulated data has only 1 cointegrating relationship.

From what I understand of the Johansen Test procedure, the estimated single cointegrating vector should be in the space spanned by the 2 estimated cointegration vectors (since they are just linear combinations of the first 2 eigenvectors of the same matrix). This does not appear to be the case in EViews. I some cases, I get large discrepancies (well beyond what I feel could be explained by floating-point arithmetic error). If I'm missing something here, could someone please let me know.

Thanks,

EViews Chris
EViews Developer
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:39 am

Re: VECM Estimation Discrepancy

Postby EViews Chris » Wed Mar 14, 2012 11:19 am

Could you give an example of a large discrepancy that you're seeing?

I just did a quick test as follows:

Run a cointegration estimation (on random data) with one cointegrating vector, then with two.

Make a new workfile with the three series:
- series01 - the cointegrating vector reported in the rank-1 estimation
- series02 - the first cointegrating vector reported in the rank-2 estimation
- series03 - the second cointegrating vector reported in the rank-2 estimation

I then regressed series01 against series02 and series03 and calculated the residuals. The largest residual in my case was about 7e-15 which is about what I'd expect from rounding error.

So, as far as I can tell, the vector reported in the rank-1 case is a linear combination of the two vectors reported in the rank-2 case as expected.


Return to “Estimation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests