AR(1) term in equation for cross-sectional data
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:56 am
In developing an OLS regression equation using cross-sectional data, I obtained an adjusted R^2 of 0.009. On a whim, I added an AR(1) term to the right side of the equation, even though I know of no statistical basis for doing this. The AR(1) increased the adjusted R^2 to 0.91. Does anyone have an idea of whether the higher R^2 was a coincidence or explained by an obscure statistical principle? Thanks.