Page 1 of 1

Logit/Probit models and Panel Data

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:02 am
by Chris_Ger
Hello everybody,

I am using EViews 7 and my workfile comprises binary panel data. I know, that Logit/Probit models also work on Panel data, but I have some specific questions and would like to ask for some support:

1.) How can I account for fixed or random effects in the panel data when estimating a Logit/Probit model?
2.) When there are lagged dependent variables present on the right hand side, biased or inconsistent estimates of the Logit/Probit model can be present. Thus, does Eviews account for lagged dependent variables? If not, did anyone ever program a logl-object for maximum likelihood estimation (e.g. based on log-likelihood function described in Heckman 1981 ("Statistical models for discrete panel data" in "Structural Analysis of discrete data"))?
3.) Is there a function to estimate heteroskedastic-corrected probits (e.g. "Hetprob" in STATA)?

Thank you very much and best regards,

Chris

Re: Logit/Probit models and Panel Data

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:56 am
by EViews Gareth
1) The only way to do it is by creating dummy variables for the fixed effects. Random effects cannot be done.

2) I don't believe so.

Re: Logit/Probit models and Panel Data

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:59 am
by Chris_Ger
Thank you very much.

Do you know whether there is a function to estimate heteroskedastic-corrected probits (e.g. "Hetprob" in STATA)?

Re: Logit/Probit models and Panel Data

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:39 am
by EViews Glenn
No, there is not.

Re: Logit/Probit models and Panel Data

Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:08 pm
by Phil O'Sophie
I'm trying to run a Heckman sample selection model using panel-data? Does Eviews have a function for this?

Thank you for your helo.

Re: Logit/Probit models and Panel Data

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:11 pm
by michelleli
Hi,
I have created firm dummies for the fixed effects. However, when I include these dummies (I have 152 firm dummie variables) in the estimation, Eviews show that "Parameter estimates for limit points are non-ascending 0". How can correct for this?

Thanks!






1) The only way to do it is by creating dummy variables for the fixed effects. Random effects cannot be done.

2) I don't believe so.