Page 1 of 2
BVAR
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 4:49 am
by olsisthebest
It is possible to impose restrictions in the parameters, as in SVAR, in a BVAR estimation?
I mean, how can I estimate a SBVAR in EViews 9?
Thank you.
Re: BVAR
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:38 am
by EViews Gareth
No
Re: BVAR
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:22 am
by olsisthebest
What are the differences between Normal-Wishart and Sims-Zha Normal Wishart priors?
Thank you.
Re: BVAR
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:52 am
by EViews Gareth
Re: BVAR
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 10:03 am
by olsisthebest
Can I impose diferent hiperparameter values across equations?
For instance, in equation 1 the dependent variable behaves like a random walk then I set mu=1, in equation 2 the dependent variable behaves like a white noise then set mu=0?
And the same for the other hyperparameters.
How can I do that?
Re: BVAR
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 11:02 am
by EViews Gareth
No.
Re: BVAR
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:25 am
by olsisthebest
I am using Sims-Zha NW prior to estimate a BVAR model.
When I use growth rates I don't have any problem. However, when I use the same variables but in levels I get the error "Near singular matrix".
Do you have any idea what is going on?
Re: BVAR
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:26 am
by EViews Gareth
Not without seeing it.
Re: BVAR
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:38 am
by olsisthebest
Please find attached the workfile.
I get the error message "near singular matrix" if i consider the variables in levels.
With growht rates (prefix "dl") I don't have any problem.
Any idea?
Thank you.
Re: BVAR
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 3:14 am
by olsisthebest
Dear all,
Does anybody have an idea about the aforedmentioned problem?
Thank you.
Re: BVAR
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 7:09 am
by startz
Is your version of EViews uptodate?
Re: BVAR
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 7:18 am
by olsisthebest
Yes it is.
Did you try to estimate the BVAR with Sims-Zha Normal Wishart priors with variables in levels?
Re: BVAR
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 7:35 am
by startz
Oh. I had just done a regular VAR. That works fine. I can confirm the Bayesian VAR does not work...and that does seem weird.
Re: BVAR
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 7:44 am
by olsisthebest
Yes, it is really weird. It is suppose to work fine since it is not possible to have perfect multicollinearity.
Let's wait for forum moderation's insights.
Re: BVAR
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:13 am
by EViews Gareth
Your hyperparameters are crazy, due to a bug in saving BVARs. We'll fix the bug, but in the meantime you'll need to re-specify the hyperparameters after opening the workfile.