On impulse response analysis
Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:41 am
Hello comrades! Nice to meet you!
I run a a VECM model with 4 endogenous variables and 3 cointegration equations from 2003 to 2013 in quarterly frequency.
I use Cholesky dof in 10 periods in impulse response analysis.
Here are my questions:
1) At the end of the determined period window (mine is 10) the shocked variables must return to zero or it depends on their actual evolution?
2) Why Cholesky dof is recommended while many papers use generalized impulse responses?
3) Which are the actual restrictions of default VECM model (are only those which concern the intercept?) and how they affect the outcome of the impulse response analysis? Namely, how they affect the presuppositions of the interaction of the variables?
Thank in advance guys for any reliable answer!
I run a a VECM model with 4 endogenous variables and 3 cointegration equations from 2003 to 2013 in quarterly frequency.
I use Cholesky dof in 10 periods in impulse response analysis.
Here are my questions:
1) At the end of the determined period window (mine is 10) the shocked variables must return to zero or it depends on their actual evolution?
2) Why Cholesky dof is recommended while many papers use generalized impulse responses?
3) Which are the actual restrictions of default VECM model (are only those which concern the intercept?) and how they affect the outcome of the impulse response analysis? Namely, how they affect the presuppositions of the interaction of the variables?
Thank in advance guys for any reliable answer!