Page 1 of 1
TSLS vs GMM
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:04 am
by Apple Tan
I need to run an IV
1) How to decide whether to use TSLS or GMM?
2) For GMM, I note that it doesn't have F-stat. So how do I tell whether the instrument is strong?
3) For both TSLS and GMM, how do I tell the instrument is exogenous?
Thank you
Re: TSLS vs GMM
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 7:24 am
by startz
TSLS is a special case of GMM
Re: TSLS vs GMM
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 7:26 am
by startz
And you generally need to use economic theory to tell if an instrument is exogenous
Re: TSLS vs GMM
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 5:46 pm
by Apple Tan
Hi
Thank you for the replies.
I still don't understand.
1) When should I use GMM vs TSLS? Anywhere that I can read up more about this
2) For GMM, there is no F-stat. So how do I tell if the instrument is weak? Usually, a F-stat<10 implies weak instrument
Thank you
Re: TSLS vs GMM
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 7:43 pm
by Apple Tan
Hi
1) I still don't understand how to decide between TSLS & GMM.
Ans:
2) Ok, I found out for GMM (non-panel data), the F-stat can be found at View --> IV Diagnostics and Tests
Query:
1) GMM / DPD - Generalized Method of Moments / Dynamic Panel Data:
i) How do I find the p-value for the J-stat?
ii) How do I find the F-stat?
2) For a panel data, using TSLS
i) how do I find the J-stat and its probability?
Thank you
Re: TSLS vs GMM
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2015 5:41 pm
by startz
If the model is linear in the parameters and you think the errors are iid, then use 2sls. Otherwise GMM might be better.
You should not necessarilyrely on F>10 as a test for weak instruments if you have more than 1 endogenous variable.