Auto-series fitting/forecasting: level or @pc()?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:54 am
Dear all,
I realized that if I compute the fitted values in levels or using the expression of the dependent variable (in my case @pc) then values, of course expressed in the same units, actually differ! Until now I thought this option "d" was only a matter of convenience of how the output should look like...
This is more or less what I did:
eq01.fit(f=actual,d) fitted_pc
eq01.fit(f=actual) fitted_level
show fitted_pc @pc(fitted_level)
When I use option "d" I get the same numbers as from the menu (Equation\View\Actual,Fitted,Residual) so I guess I should forecast as well using the "d" option... but I actually want to understand why and what EViews8 is actually doing here?
Thanks in advance!
I realized that if I compute the fitted values in levels or using the expression of the dependent variable (in my case @pc) then values, of course expressed in the same units, actually differ! Until now I thought this option "d" was only a matter of convenience of how the output should look like...
This is more or less what I did:
eq01.fit(f=actual,d) fitted_pc
eq01.fit(f=actual) fitted_level
show fitted_pc @pc(fitted_level)
When I use option "d" I get the same numbers as from the menu (Equation\View\Actual,Fitted,Residual) so I guess I should forecast as well using the "d" option... but I actually want to understand why and what EViews8 is actually doing here?
Thanks in advance!