Page 1 of 2

Wald test

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 9:44 am
by bibimiwi
Hello,

I estimated a probit model with 7 explanatory variables of which 3 are dummy variables. Two of the explanatory variables are giving me a hard time: they have a z-statistic of -0.95 and 1.46 and p-values of 0.34 and 0.14. Therefore I concluded that they are not statistically signifcant. The Wald-test comes to the same result.
BUT if I run a reduntant variable test on those two explanatory variables, they are highly significant! (The correleation between those two variables is 0.82).
How can this be, that one time they are statistically significant and the other time not???

Thank you very much

Re: Wald test

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:19 am
by EViews Glenn
What Wald test did you run?

Re: Wald test

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:25 am
by startz
It is very common for two coefficients to be jointly significant when neither is individually significant. Essentially, there is something common to the two variables that matters, but because the two variables are highly correlated it isn't possible to separate out which variable is responsible for the outcomes.

Re: Wald test

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:29 am
by bibimiwi
The one that eviews offers for the coefficient diagnostics (wald - Coefficient Restrictions...)

Re: Wald test

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:31 am
by bibimiwi
the thing is that I estimated various model, and all of them had those 2 variables included. And in all cases but this one, I was able to distinguish between those two variables.
Does a high correlation not only start at 0.98 and not already at 0.82?

Re: Wald test

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:22 am
by EViews Glenn
On the Wald test...

Yes, but which hypothesis to test did you enter?

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:34 am
by bibimiwi
I am not sure if I understood your question...
I estimated a probit model.
Is this the answer to your question?

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 6:36 am
by startz
When you went to
The one that eviews offers for the coefficient diagnostics (wald - Coefficient Restrictions...)
what command did you enter?

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:20 am
by bibimiwi
the only way possible .. c(3), c(4).

I really think that I am not getting your question

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:25 am
by startz
the only way possible .. c(3), c(4).

I really think that I am not getting your question
Glenn asked for the command you entered. Did you type "c(3),c(4)"? Or did you type something different involving c(3) and c(4)?

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:26 am
by bibimiwi
only c(3),c(4)

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:05 am
by startz
When I do that on my version nothing happens. Equal signs are required as part of the specification.

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:16 am
by bibimiwi
Equal signs are required as part of the specification.
My coefficients indeed have different signs... do you think this is the problem??
Is it not possible to perform a wald test on two coefficients with different signs?

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:17 am
by startz
Equal signs are required as part of the specification.
My coefficients indeed have different signs... do you think this is the problem??
Is it not possible to perform a wald test on two coefficients with different signs?
By "equal signs" I meant literally "="

Re: Wald test

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:33 am
by bibimiwi
Oh I am so sorry! This was completely my fault!
Of course I mean C(3)=0 and C(4)=0