Hi all,
First of all, I have been at the moment quite often here for my master thesis, which requires me to analyse data set. I have as well read topics here related to technical problems and really appreciated all the questions and answers. I actually get the same problems as some people here with "insurficient number of observations" problem. Apprencially, I have checked it again after I read topics here. All my data are correct, no missing observations.
My model is: log(y) = log(x2) log(x3) log(x4) x7 x8 x9
x7, x8, x9 as dummies.
I have panel data set from 2000 to 2013, 84 countries. So I have in total 84x14 = 1176
First, I run the command ls log(y) log(x2) log(x3) log(x4) (x7) (x8) (x9) and got the problem. Then, I managed to run it with only y= x2 x3 x4 x7 x8 x9, I got the result. Or even seperately only with log(y) log(x2); then log(y) log(x3) and so on, the result shows up. It therefore turns out that, I think that I get no problem with data but somehow more with technical things that I really have no clue.
Could you guys please help me to work it out? I really appreciate your help because I am sick of it for the whole week.
With regards, HM
insurficient number of observations problem
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Steve, EViews Moderator, EViews Jason
-
newtoeviews
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:51 am
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: insurficient number of observations problem
Are some of your variables zero or negative?
-
EViews Gareth
- Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
- Posts: 13583
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm
Re: insurficient number of observations problem
Without seeing the workfile, we can only guess. But if I were to guess, I'd say that y, x2, x3 or x4 have zero or negative values.
-
newtoeviews
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:51 am
Re: insurficient number of observations problem
Thanks for your relies. I attach here by the way the workfile. I actually set all zero values to 1 so that it was supposed to work well, but it was not. Hope you can find the problem here.
I really appreciate your response.
Thanks, HM
I really appreciate your response.
Thanks, HM
- Attachments
-
- final.wf1
- (139.75 KiB) Downloaded 437 times
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: insurficient number of observations problem
Works fine using the workfile you posted.
-
EViews Gareth
- Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
- Posts: 13583
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm
Re: insurficient number of observations problem
What he said.Works fine using the workfile you posted.
-
newtoeviews
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:51 am
Re: insurficient number of observations problem
I have checked again with log(y) log(x2) log(x3) log(x4) and it gave result but for the whole equation, including x7 x8 x9, it won´t.
-
startz
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3796
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: insurficient number of observations problem
Is this what you did?
-
newtoeviews
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:51 am
Re: insurficient number of observations problem
There is perhaps some problem of my eviews because I still can not get it. But thank you so much. I know now my data is all correct.
Many thanks and best regards, HM
Many thanks and best regards, HM
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
