Different result Eviews vs Excel

For technical questions regarding estimation of single equations, systems, VARs, Factor analysis and State Space Models in EViews. General econometric questions and advice should go in the Econometric Discussions forum.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

quoctruongphan
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:57 am

Different result Eviews vs Excel

Postby quoctruongphan » Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:30 am

Hello,

I am running a panel regression, the R^2 between Eviews and Excel is kind of different.
R^2 Eviews: -0.033164
R^2 Excel: 0.184428

To my knowledge, SST=SSR+SSE and all these value are positive. Two questions here is:
1. Why R^2 in Eviews could be negative?
2. Why there is such different between Excel Regression and Eviews in calculating R^2 while all coefficients between two programs are identical?

I included:
- Eviews file. Just take a look at eq01.
- Excel file.
+ Sheet1: all data
+ Sheet2: sample used for estimate Regression the same as sample used in Eviews. Data filter: GISC=4 and doup=1

Thank you for viewing

===============================
Unrelated questions:
1. Can we run fixed effect regression without constant c?
2. In Estimate Equation, how can we filter data >90th percentile and data<10th percentile
Attachments
NetDIss.xlsx
(685.82 KiB) Downloaded 287 times
netdiss.wf1
(405.31 KiB) Downloaded 234 times

quoctruongphan
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:57 am

Re: Different result Eviews vs Excel

Postby quoctruongphan » Sat Jul 05, 2014 4:03 am

Hope someone can help this topic,
Many thanks

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13604
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Different result Eviews vs Excel

Postby EViews Gareth » Sat Jul 05, 2014 1:44 pm

1. You have no constant. R^2 can go negative if you have no constant.
2. Without knowing how Excel calculates R^2 in the no-constant model, it is hard to know how they are differing.
3. You can specify an equation with fixed effects without a constant, but EViews will add it in for you.
4. Use the sample

quoctruongphan
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:57 am

Re: Different result Eviews vs Excel

Postby quoctruongphan » Mon Jul 07, 2014 7:24 am

1. You have no constant. R^2 can go negative if you have no constant.
2. Without knowing how Excel calculates R^2 in the no-constant model, it is hard to know how they are differing.
3. You can specify an equation with fixed effects without a constant, but EViews will add it in for you.
4. Use the sample
Thank you for your answer but:
SSE between Eviews & Excel have the same estimation: 5.06E+08 but different SSR:
+ Eviews: SSR=2383.93
+ Excel: SSR=1.14E+08

and general formula to calculate R^2 is: SSR/SST = SSR/(SSR+SSE)
Here, no matter how substituting, there is no way to obtain a negative R^2 here

Eviews: 2383/(2383+5.06E+08) ~ 3.84E-06 (non negative)
Exel : 1.14/(1.14+5.06) = 0.18

I don't know if there is any mistake in my statement, if not then can you explain more how could without constant, R^2 can be negative?

Thank you for your answer

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13604
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Different result Eviews vs Excel

Postby EViews Gareth » Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:15 am

That formula doesn't apply. To see how EViews calculates R-squared, see User Guide II.


Return to “Estimation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests