state space, Specification of the Equations

For technical questions regarding estimation of single equations, systems, VARs, Factor analysis and State Space Models in EViews. General econometric questions and advice should go in the Econometric Discussions forum.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

Lia
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:36 pm

state space, Specification of the Equations

Postby Lia » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:37 am

Hi everyone!
I am trying to relate the potential output with a simple Phillips curve and the okun law.
My model is
@signal dlgdp = sv1 + sv2
@signal dlcpi = c(1)*dlgdp (-1) + c(2)*sv5 +c(3)*lltcr+ sv3
@signal ump= c(9)*sv5 + [var = exp(c(10))]

@state sv1 = sv1(-1) + [var = exp(c(4))]
@state sv2 = c(6)*sv2(-1) + [var = exp(c(5))]
@state sv3 = c(8)*sv3(-1) + [var = exp(c(7))]
@state sv4 = sv2(-1)
@state sv5= sv4(-1)

Where dlgdp is the gdp growth, dlcpi is the inflation, ump is the natural unemployment.
My question is:
in the signal equation of dlcpi and ump I have to use the lag of the sv2, I was wondering if I correctly specified the signal equation with the sv5..
In others words if I want to use a lag of a state equation, It is this the right approach?
Furthermore, I use the lag of the dlgdp in the second signal equation. It is correctly specified?

Thank you very much!

trubador
Did you use forum search?
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: state space, Specification of the Equations

Postby trubador » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:44 pm

Your model seems allright in terms of EViews syntax. However, I think the decomposition of gdp growth (first signal equation) is ill-defined and might lead to a technical problem in estimation. You can find useful discussions on similar topics if you search the forum.

Lia
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: state space, Specification of the Equations

Postby Lia » Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:57 am

Thank you Trubador!!!! It help a lot to read others disscusion!!
Thanks again!

Lia
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: state space, Specification of the Equations

Postby Lia » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:26 am

I have another question.. The terms [var = exp(c(10))]
Imply the error term of the equation, so the value of c(10) must be not significant, this will indicated that the error term it has zero mean. If I have all the other terms significant but c(10) also is significant, something is missing in my equation right?
Thank you!

startz
Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
Posts: 3797
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: state space, Specification of the Equations

Postby startz » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:29 am

I have another question.. The terms [var = exp(c(10))]
Imply the error term of the equation, so the value of c(10) must be not significant, this will indicated that the error term it has zero mean. If I have all the other terms significant but c(10) also is significant, something is missing in my equation right?
Thank you!
No, c(10) tells you about the variance not the mean. And in this formulation the test of significance is about whether the variance equals 1.0, which is unlikely to be interesting.

Lia
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: state space, Specification of the Equations

Postby Lia » Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:54 pm

Thank you!!!


Return to “Estimation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests