Dear All
Greeting
I'm doing an estimation using PMG, my panel structure is T(2000-2019, N=78). I don't have any dummy variables, when u run PMG, I received "Near singular matrix". When I tried in STATA is working. What do you suggest?
Near singular matrix, PMG
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator
-
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Near singular matrix, PMG
In general, Stata silently drops variables when there is perfect multicollinearity while EViews gives a warning message instead. You might post your EViews file including the equation to be estimated.
Re: Near singular matrix, PMG
Dear , Sir
Attached you will find my reviews file, I want to estimate the following equation
CON1 CUR EDU FDI FIN2 INF2 GOE TR UNE Y1
Regards
Attached you will find my reviews file, I want to estimate the following equation
CON1 CUR EDU FDI FIN2 INF2 GOE TR UNE Y1
Regards
- Attachments
-
- eviewsnew.wf1
- (510.78 KiB) Downloaded 343 times
-
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Near singular matrix, PMG
Dependent Variable: CON1
Method: Panel Least Squares
Date: 12/28/20 Time: 06:07
Sample (adjusted): 2000 2018
Periods included: 18
Cross-sections included: 61
Total panel (unbalanced) observations: 755
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
CUR -8.12E+09 1.86E+09 -4.364800 0.0000
EDU -33963273 27122296 -1.252227 0.2109
FDI -2.22E+08 1.75E+08 -1.269897 0.2045
FIN2 1.26E+08 50515644 2.489889 0.0130
INF2 7.08E+08 1.57E+08 4.512228 0.0000
GOE 5.377901 0.039234 137.0715 0.0000
TR -45312197 35269080 -1.284757 0.1993
UNE -8.21E+08 1.78E+08 -4.618991 0.0000
Y1 1.25E+09 2.73E+08 4.589057 0.0000
Root MSE 2.59E+10 R-squared 0.966630
Mean dependent var 4.67E+10 Adjusted R-squared 0.966272
S.D. dependent var 1.42E+11 S.E. of regression 2.61E+10
Akaike info criterion 50.81722 Sum squared resid 5.07E+23
Schwarz criterion 50.87238 Log likelihood -19174.50
Hannan-Quinn criter. 50.83847 Durbin-Watson stat 0.196020
Method: Panel Least Squares
Date: 12/28/20 Time: 06:07
Sample (adjusted): 2000 2018
Periods included: 18
Cross-sections included: 61
Total panel (unbalanced) observations: 755
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
CUR -8.12E+09 1.86E+09 -4.364800 0.0000
EDU -33963273 27122296 -1.252227 0.2109
FDI -2.22E+08 1.75E+08 -1.269897 0.2045
FIN2 1.26E+08 50515644 2.489889 0.0130
INF2 7.08E+08 1.57E+08 4.512228 0.0000
GOE 5.377901 0.039234 137.0715 0.0000
TR -45312197 35269080 -1.284757 0.1993
UNE -8.21E+08 1.78E+08 -4.618991 0.0000
Y1 1.25E+09 2.73E+08 4.589057 0.0000
Root MSE 2.59E+10 R-squared 0.966630
Mean dependent var 4.67E+10 Adjusted R-squared 0.966272
S.D. dependent var 1.42E+11 S.E. of regression 2.61E+10
Akaike info criterion 50.81722 Sum squared resid 5.07E+23
Schwarz criterion 50.87238 Log likelihood -19174.50
Hannan-Quinn criter. 50.83847 Durbin-Watson stat 0.196020
Re: Near singular matrix, PMG
Hello
Thanks, but in my case what is problem with PMG?
Regards
Thanks, but in my case what is problem with PMG?
Regards
-
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Near singular matrix, PMG
Your workfile did not include the equation you estimated. Either include that equation or post the exact command you used.
Re: Near singular matrix, PMG
I selected the same variables that you estimated today, but I selected ARDL/PMG. Could you please help?
-
- Non-normality and collinearity are NOT problems!
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm
Re: Near singular matrix, PMG
Note that you have a lot of NAs. I suspect that once lags are included there isn't any data left.
Re: Near singular matrix, PMG
I agree with you, that what I thought, anyway, thanks a lot for help and spport
Regards
Regards
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests