I have previously used the overwrite/exclude option in a model linked to a VEC, but I am having trouble with my current model. In an earlier model (to which I still have access) I rewrote several endogenous variables, forcing them to decline rapidly, and then marking the new variables with the "_1" aliasing tag. Using the 'scenario 1' option, I told it to overwrite and exclude the original endogenous variables.
This worked fine, and when I do a dynamic stochastic solution for a forecast period, the graphs of these new artificial variables appear with no standard errors, while the other endogenous variables do -- just as I would expect. But in my current model, which I've tried to set up the same way but with a different endogenous variable excluded and overridden, It is giving me a stochastic solution for that variable, with standard errors, rather than giving me new artificial variable created under scenario 1.
This is my Scenario View -- it looks just like the other model that works well. So I can't figure out what's wrong.
Scenario List
Scenario Alias Excludes Overrides
Baseline _0
Scenario 1 _1 CO2AV
CO2AV
problem with scenario
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator
-
- Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
- Posts: 13317
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm
Re: problem with scenario
Thanks very much. Here is the workfile. Look at MODEL01, which is based on VAR01. The series I tried to manipulate and treat exogenously is CO2AV, which has been set on a path for a 30% decline as CO2AV_1. // Jim Stodder
- Attachments
-
- fix_quantity.wf1
- (682.29 KiB) Downloaded 432 times
-
- EViews Developer
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:48 pm
Re: problem with scenario
Hello,
I just wanted to let you know that we're investigating this issue. I can confirm that there is some unexpected behavior in the case of a stochastic solve where a series has been both excluded and overridden. You mentioned that you had an earlier model that behaved as expected, would you be able to post that workfile as well? Thanks.
I just wanted to let you know that we're investigating this issue. I can confirm that there is some unexpected behavior in the case of a stochastic solve where a series has been both excluded and overridden. You mentioned that you had an earlier model that behaved as expected, would you be able to post that workfile as well? Thanks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests