Gareth,
Okay, cool. Yes I did turn the legend on. I can change the text no problem, just wanted to confirm that the legend is incorrect by default.
Thanks again for your help!
Search found 5 matches
- Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:12 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Impulse response chart
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4080
- Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:03 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Impulse response chart
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4080
Re: Impulse response chart
Thanks. Shouldn't the blue series in the impulse response chart be SERIES_OF_INTEREST, i.e. the series whose response we are interested in, and not LEADING_SERIES, i.e. the series we shocked? A One S.D. shock to LEADING_SERIES should be ~4.12 (slide 2), given the coefficient on LEADING_SERIES(-2) in...
- Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:43 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Impulse response chart
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4080
Re: Impulse response chart
Sure,
I've attached a PowerPoint which lays out the model I'm referring to.
Thanks,
John
I've attached a PowerPoint which lays out the model I'm referring to.
Thanks,
John
- Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:45 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Impulse response chart
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4080
Re: Impulse response chart
To clarify ... The data values appear to be correct such that the series displayed is the response series. The legend indicates that it is instead the shocked series. Tx.
- Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:11 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Impulse response chart
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4080
Impulse response chart
Hi, I'm using v7.2 When estimating an impulse reponse from a VAR the resulting chart legend indicates that the series shown is the series which should have received the innovation and not the responding series. The data values appear to be correct relative to 'shocked series,' so I'm thinking the on...
