EViews.com

Period F: p=0.0032 Period Chi-square: p=0.0021 So period fixed effects are quite significant but not as much so as cross-section. When I use random effects the coefficients look correct, but as I said before apparently the random effects model is not appropriate here. I'm coming round to the fact th...

Thanks for your swift and helpful reply EViews Glenn. I have a panel consisting of 43 developing countries with 242 observations spanning the 5 year periods between 1960 and 2005. The observations are rather restricted as I am using inequality data which is notoriously scarce. I have tried the rando...

Hi there, I'm having big problems with my model specification. The explanatory variables' coefficients look correct when I DON'T specify fixed effects, however according to the tests that EViews provides, the fixed effects are significant and thus fixed effects model should be employed. Which would ...

Brilliant, thanks again!

Hi there.. I'm new to EViews as my username would suggest! I'm doing a project on the impact of inequality on economic growth, so I have an excel spreadsheet with data from 1970 to 1994. Because of the scarcity of inequality data I've had to use 5-year averages as there are not observations for ever...