Search found 9 matches
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:39 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: Help on F-stat in first stage of TSLS
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7373
Re: Help on F-stat in first stage of TSLS
Hi, this seems very interesting, I hope you don't mind me reviving this. I take that the first post is the correct method to deal with 1SLS for F-stat - weak instrument test. My question is regarding the redundant variable phase. I did the same thing as FOTIS did, however some of my data has N/A in ...
- Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:45 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Sargan or J-Test on Eviews
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23131
Re: Sargan or J-Test on Eviews
Thanks Hannibal, very grateful, I will see what I can do! Cheers
- Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:44 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
- Replies: 8
- Views: 18396
Re: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
Thanks again Glenn, that really clear things. Very grateful and happy!
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 11:46 pm
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
- Replies: 8
- Views: 18396
Re: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
Thanks Glenn,
Would thi smean even if I recieve a p-value of 1 in Hausman test, but a p-value of 0 in the fixed effect likelihood test, I could still continue to specify my model with Fixed effect?
Many Thanks
Would thi smean even if I recieve a p-value of 1 in Hausman test, but a p-value of 0 in the fixed effect likelihood test, I could still continue to specify my model with Fixed effect?
Many Thanks
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 10:19 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
- Replies: 8
- Views: 18396
Re: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
Thanks Glenn,
Let me get this clear, it I have zero p-value from the likelihood test it means fixed effects is significant, and if I recieve a 1 for my hausman test, it means random effects is valid.
Would this not be a contradiction, and what should I do in this situation?
Thanks
Let me get this clear, it I have zero p-value from the likelihood test it means fixed effects is significant, and if I recieve a 1 for my hausman test, it means random effects is valid.
Would this not be a contradiction, and what should I do in this situation?
Thanks
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:28 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
- Replies: 8
- Views: 18396
Re: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
Hi, I am using Eviews 6 if that helps.....
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:25 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
- Replies: 8
- Views: 18396
DESPERATION Random and Fixed Effect on Panel Data
Hi, I am having too many problems with my project at the moment, partly because I am not an econometrician and have only started doing econometris very recently. I am a possibly very simple problem that I hope someone could really help me with, I am so stuck and have literally given up hope on econo...
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:18 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Sargan or J-Test on Eviews
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23131
Re: Sargan or J-Test on Eviews
Thanks Hannibal! Very helpful!
I ran a variety of models, some come back saying that I need random effect, some saying I am fixed effect. For my fixed effects model, all of my instruments have p-value of 1.0000, whilst in random effects model, the Sargan p-value 0.0000
Confused!!
I ran a variety of models, some come back saying that I need random effect, some saying I am fixed effect. For my fixed effects model, all of my instruments have p-value of 1.0000, whilst in random effects model, the Sargan p-value 0.0000
Confused!!
- Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:47 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Sargan or J-Test on Eviews
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23131
Sargan or J-Test on Eviews
Hi, New here, great forum, very helpful. I have been trying to find ways of doing Sargan test or J-Test (I am under the impression they are the same, please correct me if I am wrong). I am currently using EViews 6, I don't think my model would suit GMM, what is the other way of performing a test on ...
