EViews.com

Yeah, had a similar experience. It confidently gives you code which is certainly not an Eviews code. :roll: Honestly, one reason I am asking is also the perspective: Quite afraid that in few years younger kids will be unwilling to code in anything for which they cannot use CHatGPT (or other LLMs) as...

Hi guys,

Just curious if there are any plans to navigate the new world of coding with ChatGPT. I tried but seems like ChatGPT does not know Eviews. Is that the case? Any plans to change that? Not sure it depends on you, of course.

CrisisStudent

Thanks, works!

Hi all,

Is there any smart way of extracting a date of a maximum or minimum value of series. We found a workaround with setting sample and then using @strdate, but seems inelegant and complicated.

Thanks!
CrisisStudent

Ok, version problem then. Thanks for looking into it and sorry for this intermittent and ultimately useless conversation.

I have got following error when accesing @varlist member of equation object:

Illegal specification for the convergence tolerance.


Interestingly, it is "self-fixing". Running the same command again does not return the message anymore.

Kamil

Yes, Eviews 12.

Enterprise edition - Feb 4 2021 build.

Sorry for delay, forgot to come back to this.

Hi guys, I think there is a small issue with x13 functionality - I think when the name of series is too long (not sure what is the exact limit) then x13 just returns series full of NAs.

I get error that @droprow is not a member or procedure of vector/matrix. Is there potentially unaddressed bug?

Ah, that's a smart idea! (Not sure why I am surprised). Especially since the addin command now includes the nowarn option, which I did not realize.

If you have example of Git hook you have in mind, feel free to share, it goes outside the scope of my (very limited) Git knowledge.

Thanks Matt for your reply, this makes everything clear.

Unfortunately, these codes are developed as part of my formal employment, so can't share them with wider community as an add-in...

Actually, now I re-read your reply and I just wanted to make sure one thing. You said "add factors are not treated as innovation shocks even in stochastic solves". But what about stochastic innovations themselves, do they interact with ARMA errors? (That is: If the stochastic innovations a...

Thanks Mat. Can I brainstorm with you an idea? 8) We had to develop our own stochastic simulation code in Eviews to give us flexible control over some of the functionalities, which means I could implement a solution to address the issue with ARMA errors propagation. That said, I am not sure how to b...

Hi guys, did you have time to consider this question?