EViews.com

Thank you for taking the time to develop a patch for our problem, it is really appreciated. Do you know when the next patch is plan to go live?

Hi Steve, You are right that in some case it would be better to open the workfile before copying, but in many case it was way faster to use copy instead of opening the workfile (at least on Eviews 12). As an exemple, using Eviews 12, if I want to copy only one serie from a large workfile (4 GB) to a...

Same machine yes

Yes, I am saving to a network drive.

I just try the same code with saving on my local drive. I still get a faster time with Eviews 12, but it is much much closer. It does seems to be link to the use of network drive. Is there a way to make eviews 13 be as fast as 12 on network drive?

I'm pretty sure you could use any workfile you have to test this. I wrote you a small program that create a workfile with 2000 random series. You need to replace the "" of %link with the path of the folder where you will save the wfile1. Those are the times I get when running this code: Ev...

Unfortunately I can't since the workfile I use is large. I did more test and it doesn't seems to be workfile related. I obtain similar result when I try to copy from smaller workfile. My latest test was on a 24MB workfile and it took 0.3 sec on eviews 12 to copy two series when it took 1.3 sec on ev...

Hi Gareth,

My coworker has the most updated version of Eviews 13 and he has the same result as me.

Hi, Since I started using Eviews 13 instead of Eviews 12, I realize that most program are a lot slower and it seems to be linked to copying series from another workfile. As an exemple, I run a small test on both eviews 12 and 13 and the time was 11 secondes longer with Eviews 13. This can add up qui...

Hi, I don't think the mnemonics are the problems because they were working fine before we install the latest patch (april 15 2019). As an exemple, we are using a code to fetch multiples mnemonics. Since we installed the latest patch we can't fetch some of those mnemonics anymore. Instead, we get the...