Search found 23 matches
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 1:04 pm
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
I have a student version at the moment so i guess i will have to purchase the full version. Thanks
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:41 pm
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
It worked thank you both so much :) now eviews is telling me that the workfile is too large and i wont be able to save any work that i do. Is there a way to pass this
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:38 pm
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
Thank you
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:33 pm
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
i tried it but i keep getting an error message
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:29 pm
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
ok will try that now thank you
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:28 pm
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
Should i do this in excel first then import it to eviews. or is there an easier way to do it in eviews?
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:35 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
Is it possible to help me create this?
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:33 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
Ok thanks but im not sure how to go about doing that :(
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:23 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
The GDPPCG69 is the GDP per capita growth for all 44 countries in the first equation The GDPPCG74 is the GDP per capita growth for all 44 countries in the second equation.. so on an so forth.. So each equation should have 44 observation. I thought that SUR requires different dependent variables in e...
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:04 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
Thank you for your reply but as i mentioned i want to run an SUR regression in which the system has nine equations, corresponding to 1969–84, 1985–89, 1990–94, 1995–99, and 2000–2004, 2005-2009. The dependent variables are average growth rates of per capita real GDP. The way the data is structured i...
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:01 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
i tried that and this is what im getting.. in the attatchment
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:21 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
thanks, sorry for that. I really need some help though
- Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:32 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
this forum is useless..
- Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:26 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Re: Converting
Will someone please help me! Im really stuck on this..
- Sat Jun 11, 2016 10:10 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Converting
- Replies: 23
- Views: 16618
Converting
Does anyone know how i can convert this dataset in eviews so that i can run an SUR regression in which the system has nine equations, corresponding to 1969–84, 1985–89, 1990–94, 1995–99, and 2000–2004, 2005-2009. The dependent variables are average growth rates of per capita real GDP. the estimation...
