Thank you, trubador.
I am not sure if this is a common misunderstanding of the SS notation, maybe it would be a good idea to highlight it on the user guide. I only noticed the behavior because the exogenous variable was a dummy, which made it simpler to interpret.
Search found 4 matches
- Thu Mar 17, 2016 8:18 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Dummy variable in state equation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3840
- Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:48 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Dummy variable in state equation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3840
Dummy variable in state equation
I am trying to add a dummy variable to a state equation on a state space model. The estimation is successful (in terms of convergence), but the estimated coefficient for the dummy variable is not what I expected it to be. I tried looking at the predicted and filtered states and the only way I can un...
- Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:28 pm
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Makestates beyond estimation sample
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3083
Re: Makestates beyond estimation sample
Worked perfectly.
Thanks!
Thanks!
- Wed Dec 23, 2015 10:12 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Makestates beyond estimation sample
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3083
Makestates beyond estimation sample
I have estimated an SSpace model using a monthly sample from 2002:01 to 2015:09, but I do have signal data until 2015:11. I would like to estimate the filtered states until 2015:11 using the estimated coefficientes until 2015:09, but it seems that the proc "makestates" allows me to estimat...
