Search found 4 matches
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:42 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Variance Ratio- homoscedasticity
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5990
Re: Variance Ratio- homoscedasticity
Thank you so very much.
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:15 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Variance Ratio- homoscedasticity
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5990
Re: Variance Ratio- homoscedasticity
Ok. Just to be clear. By go with the second test you mean the one testing for Heteroscedasticity.
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:38 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Variance Ratio- homoscedasticity
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5990
Re: Variance Ratio- homoscedasticity
Ok. I did that. No comparing my Heteroskedasticity implies the series is a martingale, but my Homoscedasticity implies that the hypothesis be rejected since the p value comes to .0045 compared to heteroskedasticity with a value of .1619. Which one is more conclusive to use. Does this mean the datase...
- Sun Mar 15, 2015 10:13 pm
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Variance Ratio- homoscedasticity
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5990
Variance Ratio- homoscedasticity
I am trying to do my dissertation, I notice most persons include the homoscedasticity results in their testing. Based on the results from Eviews it looks like heteroscedasticity may be default. How can I perform my Lo-MacKinlay variance ratio testing assuming homoscedasticity? Please let me know. Th...
