Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

For requesting general information about EViews, sharing your own tips and tricks, and information on EViews training or guides.

Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator

CharlieEVIEWS
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:47 am

Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

Postby CharlieEVIEWS » Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:02 pm

I want to replace % in alpha series. However, when i replace it with the line:

Code: Select all

alphaseries = @replace(alphaseries, "%","percent")


when I run the program, I think EViews interprets it as a string variable and the series window shows the replacement line as:

Code: Select all

Modified: 1 252701 =>
alphaseries = @replace(alphaseries, "","percent")


How do I call this special reserved character into string functions instead as a character instead of a string variable?

Apologies if I'm missing an obvious issue.

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13318
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

Postby EViews Gareth » Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:18 pm

Code: Select all

create u 100
alpha a = "100%"

a = @replace(a, "%", "percent")

show a
Follow us on Twitter @IHSEViews

CharlieEVIEWS
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:47 am

Re: Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

Postby CharlieEVIEWS » Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:22 pm

Doesnt work for me. Must have changed an option.

Last updated: 11/27/15 - 20:21
Modified: 1 100 // a = "100"
Modified: 1 100 // a = @replace(a, "", "percent")

percentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentperc
percentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentperc
percentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentpercentperc

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13318
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

Postby EViews Gareth » Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:38 pm

Are you running programs in v4 compatibility mode?
Follow us on Twitter @IHSEViews

CharlieEVIEWS
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:47 am

Re: Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

Postby CharlieEVIEWS » Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:46 pm

Yes. I am. For a reason which I dont remember, I need to. Any way to circumvent the above problem while being in this mode?

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13318
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

Postby EViews Gareth » Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:51 pm

No. Version 4 did not have alpha series.
Follow us on Twitter @IHSEViews

CharlieEVIEWS
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:47 am

Re: Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

Postby CharlieEVIEWS » Fri Nov 27, 2015 2:18 pm

Im also guessing I cant change this option 'on the fly' ?

EViews Gareth
Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
Posts: 13318
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm

Re: Calling % sign instead of using it as a string variable

Postby EViews Gareth » Fri Nov 27, 2015 3:00 pm

I'm only on my phone at the moment, so can't check for certain, but I believe you can only turn on ver4 compatibility and not turn it off.

http://www.eviews.com/help/helpintro.ht ... 23ww103410
Follow us on Twitter @IHSEViews


Return to “General Information and Tips and Tricks”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests