Coputation of fitted values
Moderators: EViews Gareth, EViews Moderator
Re: Coputation of fitted values
But this only confirms what I mentioned earlier that Heckit and manual estimation return completely different results.
-
- Fe ddaethom, fe welon, fe amcangyfrifon
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:38 pm
Re: Coputation of fitted values
Again, without knowing exactly what you're doing, there's no way for us to help.
To start, if I were you, I'd take a look at what the code I posted does, take a look at what you're doing, and then compare to see how they differ.
To start, if I were you, I'd take a look at what the code I posted does, take a look at what you're doing, and then compare to see how they differ.
Follow us on Twitter @IHSEViews
Re: Coputation of fitted values
I estimate the first stage Probit (selection stage) (without a code, built-in options in Eviews) and then compute the Inverse mills ratio using the code. Then, I estimate OLS (built-in, not a code) and explicitly include a previously stored Imills as an additional explanatory variable. I don't think there is anything wrong with this algorithm, which is more transparent than Heckit. Plus, you confirmed my code for Imills calculation was valid. Thanks anyway.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests