Search found 149 matches
- Fri May 09, 2014 8:43 am
- Forum: General Information and Tips and Tricks
- Topic: Statconn basic server test fails to connect with R 3.0
- Replies: 18
- Views: 23984
Re: Statconn basic server test fails to connect with R 3.0
wfcreate u 1 100 'obtain 2-by-2 random draws from the Wishart distribution sym(2) h h.fill 1, 0.5, 2 scalar n = 10 !mc = 10 for !i=1 to !mc sym(2) s_{!i} call wish(s_{!i},h,n) next 'will create 10 random draws (!mc=10) from the Wishart distribution 'command: wish(S, h, n) -- generates multivariate ...
- Thu May 01, 2014 8:25 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: log likelihood
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7786
Re: log likelihood
We will choose the model with the smallest value.
- Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:13 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: SUM AND STDEV OF CROSS-SECTIONS IN PANEL SETTINGS
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3737
Re: SUM AND STDEV OF CROSS-SECTIONS IN PANEL SETTINGS
One simple (and effortless) way to calculate cross-sectional-wise sums and stdev is the following. for !i=1 to @max(id01) smpl if id01 = !i scalar sum_!i = @sum(w_ret_2) scalar std = @stdev(w_ret_2) next Do you know that your workfile can be structured in panel? Please type pagestruct id01 in your c...
- Fri Aug 02, 2013 10:07 am
- Forum: Add-in Support
- Topic: Bayesian VAR
- Replies: 63
- Views: 156546
Re: Bayesian VAR
the number of df is defined to be v>m+1, not v>=m+1. I know your reference is Brandt & Freeman (2006), but I can't find it in there. They say that "v>0" which doesn't make much sense either... The Inverse-Wishart (or Wishart) distribution has finite expectations and can be invertible ...
- Thu Jun 13, 2013 8:54 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: LRTEST
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4633
Re: LRTEST
school ochildren
- Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:04 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: LRTEST
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4633
Re: LRTEST
In "the Redundant Variables Test" dialog, you can enter the names of the variables (in your equation specification) that you wish to remove in the restricted model.
- Thu Jun 06, 2013 9:44 am
- Forum: Add-in Support
- Topic: CDtest (cross-sectional dependence test)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 60542
CDtest (cross-sectional dependence test)
This thread is about the CDtest add-in that lets you test for the cross-sectional dependence in panel data. [Update] (07/01/2014) Added a new warning message, "*The distribution of Frees’ Q statistic requires T>3" for the Frees test - Computation of the appropriate quantiles for the Frees'...
- Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:22 pm
- Forum: Add-in Support
- Topic: Bivariate Normal contour
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6725
Bivariate Normal contour
This thread is about the NormContour add-in that creates a 2-dimensional Normal contour.
- Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:02 pm
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Updating/Refrshing Links in EViews Workfile Pages
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9079
Re: Updating/Refrshing Links in EViews Workfile Pages
When you create a new page, you do not need to make a copy of OBSID. Could you do the followings?
1) paste special
2) paste as link
3) merge by date
1) paste special
2) paste as link
3) merge by date
- Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:14 pm
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: how to estimate White's heteroscedasticity corrected t-value
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3863
Re: how to estimate White's heteroscedasticity corrected t-v
As an example, will generate an equation object which contains white heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors.
Code: Select all
equation e1.ls(cov=white) x1 x2
- Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:48 am
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: Recursive forecast question
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8357
Re: Recursive forecast question
Let me know how it works. !hmax = 46 for !i=1 to 51 'First step: create 46 matrices each with 46 rows and 2 columns: ignored 3rd col (the actual values) matrix (46,2) emh_forecast_{!i} 'Second step: generate forecast_emh recursively and make the out of sample values zero series forecast_emh = 0 smpl...
- Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:54 pm
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: Recursive forecast question
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8357
Re: Recursive forecast question
The program bug comes from the bad indexation. In order to resolve this problem, we should clarify the problem settings again. According to your program, the matrix emh_forecast_{!j} (!j=1,...46) should have j-period-ahead forecast at its first column where each emh_forecast_{!j} is the !j-period-fo...
- Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:17 am
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: Recursive forecast question
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8357
Re: Recursive forecast question
Can you post your workfile? I am curious about the workfile range.
- Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:32 am
- Forum: Data Manipulation
- Topic: Stacked bar graph
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10244
Re: Stacked bar graph
This is not a bug. The way EViews creates a stacked bar graph (i.e. stacking positive & negative values) is different from Excel.
You will get the desired result by choosing the checkbox of the Stacked bar graphs (Graph Elements -> Bar-Area-Pie -> Checkbox: Stacked bar graphs ) option.
You will get the desired result by choosing the checkbox of the Stacked bar graphs (Graph Elements -> Bar-Area-Pie -> Checkbox: Stacked bar graphs ) option.
- Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:28 am
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: panel data and rolling window
- Replies: 13
- Views: 14937
Re: panel data and rolling window
Following Glenn's suggestion, the starting point is set to be 1994m01 (as specified in your workfile). The trick that keeps your sample stay in the workfile is to compare the end point (i.e. 1994m01+215) with the forecast end point (i.e. 1994m01+!i+!window+2) and exit the loop when the forecast end ...