Search found 11 matches

by yguill1
Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:30 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Eviews crash on pageload
Replies: 2
Views: 196

Re: Eviews crash on pageload

Thank you for the quick reply!
by yguill1
Fri Mar 01, 2024 5:31 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Eviews crash on pageload
Replies: 2
Views: 196

Eviews crash on pageload

Eviews crashes/disappears with no error message with these instructions and the attached Access database: wfcreate a 2010 2020 pageload(type=access) Database1.accdb "select TEST from MY_TABLE" @freq U 1 @smpl @all Note that we encounter this problem accessing a SQL database but our IT spec...
by yguill1
Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:54 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Error on multiple wfsave commands
Replies: 14
Views: 100660

Re: Error on multiple wfsave commands

I have the same error (Unable to allocate memory for working array) when doing multiple 'pagesave' in a loop and writing to XLSX. My understanding is that this command is using the new Excel writing engine (Eviews 13 Oct 11 build). The error does not always happen and when it happens it is not alway...
by yguill1
Tue Oct 18, 2022 7:51 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Bug Graph Eviews 13
Replies: 5
Views: 2980

Re: Bug Graph Eviews 13

Unless one sets lineopacity(OFF), exporting a line chart to EPS (with the Proc - Save graph to disk command) produces an empty chart - no lines are visible. This does not seem to be intended behavior. Using Eviews 13 Oct 11 build.
by yguill1
Tue Oct 18, 2022 7:48 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Error 1025
Replies: 3
Views: 2598

Re: Error 1025

I have the same error when trying to export a chart with multiple panels to PDF (Eviews 13 Oct 11 build). No error when there is a single chart.
by yguill1
Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:19 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Missing titles in merged graphs
Replies: 1
Views: 3634

Missing titles in merged graphs

Say we have two graphs, each with a title added with the addtext command. If we merge those two graphs with the merge command, the new graph shows the titles correctly. We then add a title to the merged graph, again with the addtext command. So far all is well. The merged graph shows an overall titl...
by yguill1
Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:43 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Error in command capture for solveopt
Replies: 1
Views: 3875

Error in command capture for solveopt

In Eviews 9.5 June 1 2016, when unchecking the box "Use analytic derivatives" in the solver dialog of the model object, the command capture window records fullmodel.solveopt(j=f) whereas it should be (j=n) for "numeric". Indeed trying to run the command with (j=f) yields an error.
by yguill1
Mon May 06, 2013 8:45 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: New w=? option in solveopt
Replies: 1
Views: 3424

New w=? option in solveopt

First, thank you for adding the w="?" option to the solveopt options in Eviews 8 as requested some time ago. Testing the April 5 build, however, the option does not seem to work. Using the following line, both from the command line or from within a program: fullmodel.solve(i=p, o=n, j=a, t...
by yguill1
Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:53 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Typo in model solve window
Replies: 1
Views: 3393

Typo in model solve window

Using the latest update (29 May), when you solve a model for the baseline and an alternative scenario, there is a small typo in the messages window: Model: FULLMODEL Date: 11/06/12 Time: 18:51 Sample: 2014 2030 Solve Options: Dynamic-Deterministic Simulation Forward Solution Solver: Newton Max itera...
by yguill1
Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:00 am
Forum: Programming
Topic: Option for solver in program
Replies: 3
Views: 5290

Re: Option for solver in program

Thank you for considering adding this option to the solve command. The reason this would be useful is that some (somewhat unstable) forward-looking models solve well when the algorithm only loops forward and don't solve at all (under any of of solvers) when the alrorithm loops both forward and backw...
by yguill1
Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:14 am
Forum: Programming
Topic: Option for solver in program
Replies: 3
Views: 5290

Option for solver in program

I am writing an Eviews program and would like to do the equivalent of “unchecking” the box “Solve model in both directions” using the model_name.solve(options) command or in some other way. There seems to be no option to do so, at least in the documentation, but perhaps the option exists? If it does...

Go to advanced search