Search found 6 matches

by yguill1
Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:19 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Missing titles in merged graphs
Replies: 1
Views: 201

Missing titles in merged graphs

Say we have two graphs, each with a title added with the addtext command. If we merge those two graphs with the merge command, the new graph shows the titles correctly. We then add a title to the merged graph, again with the addtext command. So far all is well. The merged graph shows an overall titl...
by yguill1
Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:43 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Error in command capture for solveopt
Replies: 1
Views: 1165

Error in command capture for solveopt

In Eviews 9.5 June 1 2016, when unchecking the box "Use analytic derivatives" in the solver dialog of the model object, the command capture window records fullmodel.solveopt(j=f) whereas it should be (j=n) for "numeric". Indeed trying to run the command with (j=f) yields an error.
by yguill1
Mon May 06, 2013 8:45 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: New w=? option in solveopt
Replies: 1
Views: 1325

New w=? option in solveopt

First, thank you for adding the w="?" option to the solveopt options in Eviews 8 as requested some time ago. Testing the April 5 build, however, the option does not seem to work. Using the following line, both from the command line or from within a program: fullmodel.solve(i=p, o=n, j=a, t...
by yguill1
Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:53 am
Forum: Bug Reports
Topic: Typo in model solve window
Replies: 1
Views: 1320

Typo in model solve window

Using the latest update (29 May), when you solve a model for the baseline and an alternative scenario, there is a small typo in the messages window: Model: FULLMODEL Date: 11/06/12 Time: 18:51 Sample: 2014 2030 Solve Options: Dynamic-Deterministic Simulation Forward Solution Solver: Newton Max itera...
by yguill1
Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:00 am
Forum: Programming
Topic: Option for solver in program
Replies: 3
Views: 2393

Re: Option for solver in program

Thank you for considering adding this option to the solve command. The reason this would be useful is that some (somewhat unstable) forward-looking models solve well when the algorithm only loops forward and don't solve at all (under any of of solvers) when the alrorithm loops both forward and backw...
by yguill1
Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:14 am
Forum: Programming
Topic: Option for solver in program
Replies: 3
Views: 2393

Option for solver in program

I am writing an Eviews program and would like to do the equivalent of “unchecking” the box “Solve model in both directions” using the model_name.solve(options) command or in some other way. There seems to be no option to do so, at least in the documentation, but perhaps the option exists? If it does...

Go to advanced search