Search found 40 matches
- Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:08 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Regression in Hamilton filter add-in
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4250
Re: Regression in Hamilton filter add-in
Great, I will.
- Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:00 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Regression in Hamilton filter add-in
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4250
Regression in Hamilton filter add-in
Looking at the Hamilton filter add-in it seems as if a regression on the four most recent lags is run and direct forecasts are made h periods into the future based in the estimation results in order to get a trend estimate. That is: y_t=c(1)+c(2)*y_{t-1}+c(3)*y_{t-2}+c(4)*y_{t-3}+c(5)*y_{t-4} is est...
- Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:17 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Null hypothesis on intercept in unit root test
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4348
Re: Null hypothesis on intercept in unit root test
That is absolutely true. The critical values depends both on what deterministic components you include and whether you test a simple or joint hypothesis. Tabulations exist for all of them. As long as you know what hypothesis you test, you can find the right critical values. The built-in EViews proce...
- Wed Sep 27, 2017 5:39 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Null hypothesis on intercept in unit root test
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4348
Re: Null hypothesis on intercept in unit root test
when perorming the ADF tests.In the EViews test procedures there are no restrictions placed on the deterministic components of the test regression. Under a) a pure AR model (without deterministic trend components) is specified: y_t=\rho*y_{t-1}+\eps_t. The test performed is on \rho. Under b) and c),...
- Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:39 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Long-run variance and KPSS testing
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4842
Long-run variance and KPSS testing
Hi, I am doing some unit root testing using the KPSS test. When selecting the HAC variance in this test I can select the Bartlett window and set the user specified value of of the bandwidth to 1. This will use the autocovariance at lags zero (i.e. the varaince) and one (the first autocovariance) in ...
- Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:45 am
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: Call Matlab from Eviews (COM Automation)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3855
Re: Call Matlab from Eviews (COM Automation)
Hi.
Have you tried:
If that works you can use:
to execute commands in EViews from Matlab.
/K
Have you tried:
Code: Select all
handle=actxserver('Eviews.Manager');
application=handle.GetApplication;
If that works you can use:
Code: Select all
application.Run('cd C:\MyEViewsHacks\');
to execute commands in EViews from Matlab.
/K
- Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:41 am
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: "Solve Control for Target" to new variable
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2519
"Solve Control for Target" to new variable
Hi. I have a question regarding "Solve Control for Target". Suppose that I have a model with the equations: y1=x1 y2=x2 sum=x1+x2 Suppose that y1 , y2 and sum are endogeneous and that x1 and x2 are exogeneous and take the values 1 and 2 throughout the sample. Also, the series target_zero c...
- Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:15 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Lag Selection and Johansen Cointegration Test
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3160
Re: Lag Selection and Johansen Cointegration Test
Perhaps you have too many variables so that you loose all you DoFs?
- Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:41 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: Bayesian VAR
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4728
Re: Bayesian VAR
The easiest way is to estimate the small VAR model and then use the hyper parameters of the Litterman prior to achieve the same in-sample fit (in whatever way it is measured) for the interest rate equation in the larger model.
- Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:55 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: Durbin-Wu-Hausman Test
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5608
Re: Durbin-Wu-Hausman Test
If you generally use the following formula for the DWH test: TestStat=d' * inv(Est Asy Var [d]) * d where d is the difference between the IV and LS estimators, you can use the following command to extract the components needed: matrix MyOLSBeta=OLS_eq.@coef matrix MyOLSCov=OLS_eq.@coefcov matrix MyI...
- Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:21 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Forecasting with VAR and VECM
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2804
Re: Forecasting with VAR and VECM
Should you expect the same value when you do simulations?
Could you use the mean over the various baselines?
/K
Could you use the mean over the various baselines?
/K
- Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:13 am
- Forum: Econometric Discussions
- Topic: Bayesian VAR
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4728
Re: Bayesian VAR
When you run a BVAR, you have to set your priors. This can be done in several ways. The way chosen in your reference is to match an in-sample fit. But you can choose your priors other ways than this. Usually, you transform the variables to a stationary VAR-representation before applying Bayesian est...
- Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:16 am
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: generating a series
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3114
Re: generating a series
In the case when you can construct the series analytically, you can use:
series MySer=(whatever formula)
Otherwise you can approximate it by a loooooong finite sum (provided that the infinite sum converges)
/K
series MySer=(whatever formula)
Otherwise you can approximate it by a loooooong finite sum (provided that the infinite sum converges)
/K
- Wed Jan 18, 2017 5:44 am
- Forum: Estimation
- Topic: Restricting the dependent variable
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4188
Re: Restricting the dependent variable
Perhaps logit-type specifications could work:
fraction_i=exp(x_i*beta_i)/exp(sum_i x_i*beta_i)
/K
fraction_i=exp(x_i*beta_i)/exp(sum_i x_i*beta_i)
/K
- Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:00 am
- Forum: Programming
- Topic: Extract path
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2289
Extract path
Is there any convenient (pre-built) way to extract the path part of a string that is returned from uifiledlg? That is, from @uifiledlg(%myFile, "prg", "open") could I extract the path part of %myFile and separate it from the file part? Best, Kristian Edit: The current clunky solu...